Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 May 15;309(19):2016-24.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4919.

Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse

Ingrid Nygaard et al. JAMA. .

Erratum in

  • JAMA. 2013 Sep 11;310(10):1076

Abstract

Importance: More than 225 000 surgeries are performed annually in the United States for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the most durable POP surgery, but little is known about safety and long-term effectiveness.

Objectives: To describe anatomic and symptomatic outcomes up to 7 years after abdominal sacrocolpopexy, and to determine whether these are affected by concomitant anti-incontinence surgery (Burch urethropexy).

Design, setting, and participants: Long-term follow-up of the randomized, masked 2-year Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) trial of women with stress continence who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy between 2002 and 2005 for symptomatic POP and also received either concomitant Burch urethropexy or no urethropexy. Ninety-two percent (215/233) of eligible 2-year CARE trial completers were enrolled in the extended CARE study; and 181 (84%) and 126 (59%) completed 5 and 7 years of follow-up, respectively. The median follow-up was 7 years.

Main outcomes and measures: Symptomatic POP failure requiring retreatment or self-reported bulge; or anatomic POP failure requiring retreatment or Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification evaluation demonstrating descent of the vaginal apex below the upper third of the vagina, or anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse beyond the hymen. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with more than 1 symptom or interval treatment; or overall UI score of 3 or greater on the Incontinence Severity Index.

Results: By year 7, the estimated probabilities of treatment failure (POP, SUI, UI) from parametric survival modeling for the urethropexy group and the no urethropexy group, respectively, were 0.27 and 0.22 for anatomic POP (treatment difference of 0.050; 95% CI, -0.161 to 0.271), 0.29 and 0.24 for symptomatic POP (treatment difference of 0.049; 95% CI, -0.060 to 0.162), 0.48 and 0.34 for composite POP (treatment difference of 0.134; 95% CI, -0.096 to 0.322), 0.62 and 0.77 for SUI (treatment difference of -0.153; 95% CI, -0.268 to 0.030), and 0.75 and 0.81 for overall UI (treatment difference of -0.064; 95% CI, -0.161 to 0.032). Mesh erosion probability at 7 years (estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method) was 10.5% (95% CI, 6.8% to 16.1%).

Conclusions and relevance: During 7 years of follow-up, abdominal sacrocolpopexy failure rates increased in both groups. Urethropexy prevented SUI longer than no urethropexy. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy effectiveness should be balanced with long-term risks of mesh or suture erosion.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00099372.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow. At the conclusion of the 2-year CARE study, 71 women were not eligible for E-CARE as they were participants from 2 sub-contract sites and 1 original PFDN site that did not participate in E-CARE. Of the 215 E-CARE participants, 66 women underwent their index study surgery at 3 sites that, after completion of the CARE study, did not continue into the next funding cycle; these women only had the opportunity to participate in the centralized telephone QOL interviews..
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for success of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in treating pelvic organ prolapse through year 7, using anatomic and symptomatic definitions of success. Figure 2a, updated anatomic success. Figure 2b, symptomatic success.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for success of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in treating pelvic organ prolapse through year 7, using anatomic and symptomatic definitions of success. Figure 2a, updated anatomic success. Figure 2b, symptomatic success.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curve for success for stress urinary incontinence (absence of SUI) through year 7.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier failure curve for mesh erosion using last clinic visit as right censoring date Point estimate and 95% CI for probability of mesh erosion at the time of the last reported erosion (6.18 years): 0.105 (0.068, 0.161).

Comment in

References

    1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–506. - PubMed
    1. Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1096–100. - PubMed
    1. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CMA. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010. (4):Art. No.: CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nygaard I, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. for the Pelvic Floor disorders network. Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Comprehensive Review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805–23. - PubMed
    1. Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;98(4):646–51. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data