Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 28;108(10):1942-8.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.203. Epub 2013 May 16.

Does the 'Liverpool Care Pathway' facilitate an improvement in quality of care for dying cancer patients?

Affiliations

Does the 'Liverpool Care Pathway' facilitate an improvement in quality of care for dying cancer patients?

C R Mayland et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP) aims to transfer hospice principles of care for dying patients to other health-care sectors. This post-bereavement survey explored the LCP's effectiveness in improving quality of care for cancer patients.

Methods: Postal self-completion questionnaires were sent to 778 next-of-kin to consecutive deceased patients who had died an 'expected' cancer death in a hospice and acute tertiary hospital.

Results: Following exclusions (n=53), 255 of the 725 next-of-kin agreed to participate (35.2% response rate). Overall hospice participants reported the best quality of care, and hospital participants, for whom care was not supported by the LCP, reported the worst quality of care. Multivariate analysis showed the hospice was an independent predictor for patients being treated with dignity (OR 8.46) and receiving adequate family support (OR 7.18) (P<0.0001). Care supported by the LCP and the hospital specialist palliative care team were both associated with good family support, but neither was an independent predictor.

Conclusions: From the bereaved relatives' perspective, within the hospital, the LCP is effective in improving specific aspects of care, such as symptom control for dying patients. Further improvement is required, however, to attain the hospice standard of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Addington-Hall JM, O'Callaghan AC. A comparison of the quality of care provided to cancer patients in the UK in the last three months of life in in-patient hospices compared with hospitals, from the perspective of bereaved relatives: results from a survey using the VOICES questionnaire. Palliat Med. 2009;23 (3:190–197. - PubMed
    1. Auret K, Bulsara C, Joske D. Australasian haematologist referral patterns to palliative care: lack of consensus on when and why. Intern Med J. 2003;33:190–197. - PubMed
    1. Bookbinder M, Blank A, Arney E, Wollner D, Lesage P, McHugh M, Indelicato RA, Harding S, Barenboim A, Mirozyev T, Portenoy RK. Improving end-of-life care: development and pilot-test of a clinical pathway. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;29:529–543. - PubMed
    1. Clerk JB, Sheward K, Marshall B, Allan SG. Staff perceptions of end-of-life care following implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient in the acute care setting: a New Zealand perspective. J Palliat Med. 2012;15 (4:468–473. - PubMed
    1. Commonwealth of Australia Supporting Australians to live well at the end of life. National Palliative Care Strategy 2010 2010.

MeSH terms