Selective tracking of template DNA strands after induction of mitosis with unreplicated genomes (MUGs) in Drosophila S2 cells
- PMID: 23681663
- DOI: 10.1007/s10577-013-9354-z
Selective tracking of template DNA strands after induction of mitosis with unreplicated genomes (MUGs) in Drosophila S2 cells
Abstract
According to the "immortal" DNA strand hypothesis (Cairns Nature 255:197-200, 1975), stem cells would keep their template strands in order to prevent the accumulation of mutations, which could occur during DNA replication. Despite the growing number of studies that attempt to test this hypothesis, the conclusions remain highly controversial. In the base of this controversy lie the current limitations of available methodology to selectively and faithfully track the fate of template DNA strands throughout and upon cell division. Here, we developed a method that allows the unequivocal tracking of single chromatids containing template DNA strands in Drosophila S2 cells in culture. This method consists in the induction of mitosis with unreplicated genomes (MUGs) in which cells are allowed to enter mitosis without prior DNA replication. This is achieved by RNAi-mediated knockdown of Double parked, a conserved protein required for the initiation of DNA replication and post-replication checkpoint response. The advantages of this system when compared with MUGs generated in mammalian cells is the preservation of chromatid morphology, the ease of loss-of-function studies and the possibility of in vivo applications. Altogether, this approach allows for the readily visualization and tracking of template DNA strands by simply monitoring cells stably expressing GFP-fusions with either Histone H2B or the centromeric Histone variant CID/CENP-A by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. This might be useful for the dissection of the molecular mechanism behind asymmetric DNA strand segregation.
Similar articles
-
BubR1 and CENP-E have antagonistic effects upon the stability of microtubule-kinetochore attachments in Drosophila S2 cell mitosis.Cell Cycle. 2007 Jun 1;6(11):1367-78. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.11.4271. Epub 2007 Jun 11. Cell Cycle. 2007. PMID: 17525528
-
Stem cell identity and template DNA strand segregation.Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008 Dec;20(6):716-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Nov 25. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008. PMID: 18996191 Review.
-
Mad2-independent spindle assembly checkpoint activation and controlled metaphase-anaphase transition in Drosophila S2 cells.Mol Biol Cell. 2007 Mar;18(3):850-63. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-07-0587. Epub 2006 Dec 20. Mol Biol Cell. 2007. PMID: 17182852 Free PMC article.
-
Biased DNA segregation in Drosophila male germline stem cells.Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013 Aug-Sep;24(8-9):618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 23. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013. PMID: 23707893 Review.
-
Kinetochore-spindle microtubule interactions during mitosis.Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005 Feb;17(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.12.009. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005. PMID: 15661517 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Polar Ejection Forces Promote the Conversion from Lateral to End-on Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments on Mono-oriented Chromosomes.Cell Rep. 2015 Oct 20;13(3):460-468. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Oct 8. Cell Rep. 2015. PMID: 26456825 Free PMC article.
-
Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Uncomfortable Considerations.Curr Mol Biol Rep. 2017 Sep;3(3):165-171. doi: 10.1007/s40610-017-0068-4. Epub 2017 Jul 29. Curr Mol Biol Rep. 2017. PMID: 34194956 Free PMC article.
-
Mitotic spindle multipolarity without centrosome amplification.Nat Cell Biol. 2014 May;16(5):386-94. doi: 10.1038/ncb2958. Nat Cell Biol. 2014. PMID: 24914434 Review.
-
DNA Replication Stress and Chromosomal Instability: Dangerous Liaisons.Genes (Basel). 2020 Jun 10;11(6):642. doi: 10.3390/genes11060642. Genes (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32532049 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases