Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;15(2):166-72.
doi: 10.5812/ircmj.8649. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

Application of smoothing methods for determining of the effecting factors on the survival rate of gastric cancer patients

Affiliations

Application of smoothing methods for determining of the effecting factors on the survival rate of gastric cancer patients

Hoda Noorkojuri et al. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Smoothing methods are widely used to analyze epidemiologic data, particularly in the area of environmental health where non-linear relationships are not uncommon. This study focused on three different smoothing methods in Cox models: penalized splines, restricted cubic splines and fractional polynomials.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of prognostic factors on survival of patients with gastric cancer using the smoothing methods in Cox model and Cox proportional hazards. Also, all models were compared to each other in order to find the best one.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively studied 216 patients with gastric cancer who were registered in one referral cancer registry center in Tehran, Iran. Age at diagnosis, sex, presence of metastasis, tumor size, histology type, lymph node metastasis, and pathologic stages were entered in to analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model and smoothing methods in Cox model. The SPSS version 18.0 and R version 2.14.1 were used for data analysis. These models compared with Akaike information criterion.

Results: In this study, The 5 year survival rate was 30%. The Cox proportional hazards, penalized spline and fractional polynomial models let to similar results and Akaike information criterion showed a better performance for these three models comparing to the restricted cubic spline. Also, P-value and likelihood ratio test in restricted cubic spline was greater than other models. Note that the best model is indicated by the lowest Akaike information criterion.

Conclusions: The use of smoothing methods helps us to eliminate non-linear effects but it is more appropriate to use Cox proportional hazards model in medical data because of its' ease of interpretation and capability of modeling both continuous and discrete covariates. Also, Cox proportional hazards model and smoothing methods analysis identified that age at diagnosis and tumor size were independent prognostic factors for the survival of patients with gastric cancer (P < 0.05). According to these results the early detection of patients at younger age and in primary stages may be important to increase survival.

Keywords: Proportional Hazards Models; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Survival Curve of GC Patients With 95% Confidence Interval for Smoothing Methods and Cox PH Model

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Statist Soc B. Series B (Methodological). 1972;34:187–220.
    1. Wartenberg D, Savitz DA. Evaluating exposure cutpoint bias in epidemiologic studies of electric and magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1993;14(3):237–45. - PubMed
    1. Greenland S. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis. Epidemiology. 1995;6(4):356–65. - PubMed
    1. Greenland S. Problems in the average-risk interpretation of categorical dose-response analyses. Epidemiology. 1995;6(5):563–5. - PubMed
    1. Govindarajulu US, Spiegelman D, Thurston SW, Ganguli B, Eisen EA. Comparing smoothing techniques in Cox models for exposure-response relationships. Stat Med. 2007;26(20):3735–52. doi: 10.1002/sim.2848. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources