Application of smoothing methods for determining of the effecting factors on the survival rate of gastric cancer patients
- PMID: 23682331
- PMCID: PMC3652506
- DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.8649
Application of smoothing methods for determining of the effecting factors on the survival rate of gastric cancer patients
Abstract
Background: Smoothing methods are widely used to analyze epidemiologic data, particularly in the area of environmental health where non-linear relationships are not uncommon. This study focused on three different smoothing methods in Cox models: penalized splines, restricted cubic splines and fractional polynomials.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of prognostic factors on survival of patients with gastric cancer using the smoothing methods in Cox model and Cox proportional hazards. Also, all models were compared to each other in order to find the best one.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively studied 216 patients with gastric cancer who were registered in one referral cancer registry center in Tehran, Iran. Age at diagnosis, sex, presence of metastasis, tumor size, histology type, lymph node metastasis, and pathologic stages were entered in to analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model and smoothing methods in Cox model. The SPSS version 18.0 and R version 2.14.1 were used for data analysis. These models compared with Akaike information criterion.
Results: In this study, The 5 year survival rate was 30%. The Cox proportional hazards, penalized spline and fractional polynomial models let to similar results and Akaike information criterion showed a better performance for these three models comparing to the restricted cubic spline. Also, P-value and likelihood ratio test in restricted cubic spline was greater than other models. Note that the best model is indicated by the lowest Akaike information criterion.
Conclusions: The use of smoothing methods helps us to eliminate non-linear effects but it is more appropriate to use Cox proportional hazards model in medical data because of its' ease of interpretation and capability of modeling both continuous and discrete covariates. Also, Cox proportional hazards model and smoothing methods analysis identified that age at diagnosis and tumor size were independent prognostic factors for the survival of patients with gastric cancer (P < 0.05). According to these results the early detection of patients at younger age and in primary stages may be important to increase survival.
Keywords: Proportional Hazards Models; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prognostic factors in gastric cancer using log-normal censored regression model.Indian J Med Res. 2009 Mar;129(3):262-7. Indian J Med Res. 2009. PMID: 19491418
-
Comparing Smoothing Techniques for Fitting the Nonlinear Effect of Covariate in Cox Models.Acta Inform Med. 2016 Feb;24(1):38-41. doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.38-41. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Acta Inform Med. 2016. PMID: 27041809 Free PMC article.
-
Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients using additive hazards regression models.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(7):1697-702. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011. PMID: 22126547
-
Multivariate prognostic study on large gastric cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2007 Jul 1;96(1):14-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20631. J Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17582596 Review.
-
Data Analysis.2016 Sep 10. In: MIT Critical Data, editor. Secondary Analysis of Electronic Health Records [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2016. Chapter 16. 2016 Sep 10. In: MIT Critical Data, editor. Secondary Analysis of Electronic Health Records [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2016. Chapter 16. PMID: 31314259 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Survival of gastric cancer patients in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2023;16(3):245-258. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v16i2.2674. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2023. PMID: 37767325 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Survival of gastric cancer patients based on pathologic and demographic characteristics in Mazandaran between 2007 and 2013.Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2019 Fall;12(4):315-321. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2019. PMID: 31749920 Free PMC article.
-
Survival rate of gastric cancer in Iran; a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2016 Spring;9(2):78-86. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2016. PMID: 27099666 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Statist Soc B. Series B (Methodological). 1972;34:187–220.
-
- Wartenberg D, Savitz DA. Evaluating exposure cutpoint bias in epidemiologic studies of electric and magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1993;14(3):237–45. - PubMed
-
- Greenland S. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis. Epidemiology. 1995;6(4):356–65. - PubMed
-
- Greenland S. Problems in the average-risk interpretation of categorical dose-response analyses. Epidemiology. 1995;6(5):563–5. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources