Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Oct;37(10):1787-93.
doi: 10.1111/acer.12146. Epub 2013 May 17.

A new method for evaluating compliance with industry self-regulation codes governing the content of alcohol advertising

Thomas F Babor  1 , Ziming Xuan, Donna Damon
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A new method for evaluating compliance with industry self-regulation codes governing the content of alcohol advertising

Thomas F Babor et al. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the use of a modified Delphi technique in combination with a previously developed alcohol advertising rating procedure to detect content violations in the U.S. Beer Institute Code. A related aim was to estimate the minimum number of raters needed to obtain reliable evaluations of code violations in television commercials.

Methods: Six alcohol ads selected for their likelihood of having code violations were rated by community and expert participants (N = 286). Quantitative rating scales were used to measure the content of alcohol advertisements based on alcohol industry self-regulatory guidelines. The community group participants represented vulnerability characteristics that industry codes were designed to protect (e.g., age <21); experts represented various health-related professions, including public health, human development, alcohol research, and mental health. Alcohol ads were rated on 2 occasions separated by 1 month. After completing Time 1 ratings, participants were randomized to receive feedback from 1 group or the other.

Results: Findings indicate that (i) ratings at Time 2 had generally reduced variance, suggesting greater consensus after feedback, (ii) feedback from the expert group was more influential than that of the community group in developing group consensus, (iii) the expert group found significantly fewer violations than the community group, (iv) experts representing different professional backgrounds did not differ among themselves in the number of violations identified, and (v) a rating panel composed of at least 15 raters is sufficient to obtain reliable estimates of code violations.

Conclusions: The Delphi technique facilitates consensus development around code violations in alcohol ad content and may enhance the ability of regulatory agencies to monitor the content of alcoholic beverage advertising when combined with psychometric-based rating procedures.

Keywords: Adolescents; Advertising; Alcohol; Alcohol Industry; Self-Regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
95% confidence intervals (with bootstrapped standard errors) for the model-based variance from 139 expert raters
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson P. The impact of alcohol advertising: ELSA project report on the evidence to strengthen regulation to protect young people. Utrecht: National Foundation for Alcohol Prevention; 2007. [Accessed June 9, 2008]. Available at: http://www.stap.nl/content/bestanden/elsa_4_report_on_impact.pdf)
    1. Austin EW, Pinkleton BE, Hust SJ, Miller AC. The locus of message meaning: Differences between trained message recipients in the analysis of alcoholic beverage advertising. Commun Methods Meas. 2007;1:91–111.
    1. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle J, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. AUDIT The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in Primary Care. 2nd edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Babor TF, Xuan X, Damon D. Changes in the self-regulation guidelines of the US beer code reduce the number of content violations reported in TV advertisements. Journal of Public Affairs. 2010;10:6–18.
    1. Babor TF, Xuan Z, Proctor DC. Reliability of a rating procedure to monitor industry self-regulation codes governing alcohol advertising content. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;69:235–242. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources