Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;49(13):2926-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 May 15.

Site-specific cancer risk in the Baltic cohort of Chernobyl cleanup workers, 1986-2007

Kaja Rahu  1 , Timo Hakulinen, Giedre Smailyte, Aivars Stengrevics, Anssi Auvinen, Peter D Inskip, John D Boice Jr, Mati Rahu
Affiliations

Site-specific cancer risk in the Baltic cohort of Chernobyl cleanup workers, 1986-2007

Kaja Rahu et al. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To assess site-specific cancer risk in the Baltic cohort of Chernobyl cleanup workers, 1986-2007.

Methods: The Baltic cohort includes 17,040 men from Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania who participated in the environmental cleanup after the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station in 1986-1991 and who were followed up for cancer incidence until the end of 2007. Cancer cases diagnosed in the cohort and in the male population of each country were identified from the respective national cancer registers. The proportional incidence ratio (PIR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the site-specific cancer risk in the cohort. For comparison and as it was possible, the site-specific standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated for the Estonian sub-cohort, which was not feasible for the other countries.

Results: Overall, 756 cancer cases were reported during 1986-2007. A higher proportion of thyroid cancers in relation to the male population was found (PIR=2.76; 95%CI 1.63-4.36), especially among those who started their mission shortly after the accident, in April-May 1986 (PIR=6.38; 95%CI 2.34-13.89). Also, an excess of oesophageal cancers was noted (PIR=1.52; 95% CI 1.06-2.11). No increased PIRs for leukaemia or radiation-related cancer sites combined were observed. PIRs and SIRs for the Estonian sub-cohort demonstrated the same site-specific cancer risk pattern.

Conclusion: Consistent evidence of an increase in radiation-related cancers in the Baltic cohort was not observed with the possible exception of thyroid cancer, where conclusions are hampered by known medical examination including thyroid screening among cleanup workers.

Keywords: Chernobyl nuclear accident; Estonia; Incidence; Latvia; Lithuania; Neoplasms; Radiation effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tekkel M, Rahu M, Veidebaum T, et al. The Estonian study of Chernobyl cleanup workers: I. Design and questionnaire data. Radiat Res. 1997;147:641–52. - PubMed
    1. Stengrevics A. Coordination of studies of health risks in the Chernobyl clean-up workers and their offspring in the Baltic countries. Report on a WHO consultation, Helsinki 25–26 May 1992 EUR/ICP/CEH 117 4150s. WHO Regional Office for Europe; Copenhagen: 1993. Latvian Chernobyl clean-up workers’ cohort and planned studies.
    1. Kesminiene A, Kurtinaitis J, Rimdeika G. The study of Chernobyl clean-up workers from Lithuania. Acta Med Lituanica. 1997;2:55–61.
    1. Rahu M, McKee M. Epidemiological research labelled as a violation of privacy: the case of Estonia. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:678–82. - PubMed
    1. Boyle P, Parkin DM. Statistical methods for registries. In: Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG, editors. Cancer registration: principles and methods. IARC; Lyon, France: 1991. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms