Effects of various electrode configurations on music perception, intonation and speaker gender identification
- PMID: 23684531
- DOI: 10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000037
Effects of various electrode configurations on music perception, intonation and speaker gender identification
Abstract
Advances in speech coding strategies and electrode array designs for cochlear implants (CIs) predominantly aim at improving speech perception. Current efforts are also directed at transmitting appropriate cues of the fundamental frequency (F0) to the auditory nerve with respect to speech quality, prosody, and music perception. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of various electrode configurations and coding strategies on speech intonation identification, speaker gender identification, and music quality rating. In six MED-EL CI users electrodes were selectively deactivated in order to simulate different insertion depths and inter-electrode distances when using the high definition continuous interleaved sampling (HDCIS) and fine structure processing (FSP) speech coding strategies. Identification of intonation and speaker gender was determined and music quality rating was assessed. For intonation identification HDCIS was robust against the different electrode configurations, whereas fine structure processing showed significantly worse results when a short electrode depth was simulated. In contrast, speaker gender recognition was not affected by electrode configuration or speech coding strategy. Music quality rating was sensitive to electrode configuration. In conclusion, the three experiments revealed different outcomes, even though they all addressed the reception of F0 cues. Rapid changes in F0, as seen with intonation, were the most sensitive to electrode configurations and coding strategies. In contrast, electrode configurations and coding strategies did not show large effects when F0 information was available over a longer time period, as seen with speaker gender. Music quality relies on additional spectral cues other than F0, and was poorest when a shallow insertion was simulated.
Keywords: Cochlear implant; Insertion depth; Inter-electrode distance; Music quality; Prosody.
Similar articles
-
Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):582-90. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000170. Ear Hear. 2015. PMID: 25906173
-
[Speech and pitch perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy].Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May;27(10):481-4. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 23937013 Chinese.
-
A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation.Int J Audiol. 2011 Aug;50(8):503-18. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.562246. Epub 2011 Jun 21. Int J Audiol. 2011. PMID: 21689048
-
Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants.Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 22. Hear Res. 2015. PMID: 25456089 Review.
-
Angular Electrode Insertion Depth and Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review.Otol Neurotol. 2019 Aug;40(7):900-910. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002298. Otol Neurotol. 2019. PMID: 31135680 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;273(9):2343-53. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3789-0. Epub 2015 Oct 6. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 26440105
-
Recognizing Voices Through a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review of Voice Perception, Talker Discrimination, and Talker Identification.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Aug 17;65(8):3165-3194. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00209. Epub 2022 Aug 4. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 35926089 Free PMC article.
-
[Speaker discrimination in cochlear implant users].HNO. 2017 Mar;65(3):243-250. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0225-8. HNO. 2017. PMID: 27538938 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Apr;23(2):184-190. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1661360. Epub 2018 Oct 24. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 30956703 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical