A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples
- PMID: 23684993
- PMCID: PMC5809576
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.05.008
A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples
Abstract
Differences in the composition of the gut microbiota have been associated with a range of diseases using culture-independent methods. Reliable extraction of nucleic acid is a key step in identifying the composition of the faecal microbiota. Five widely used commercial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction kits (QIAsymphony® Virus/Bacteria Midi Kit (kit QS), ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep™ (kit Z), QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini Kit (kit QA), Ultraclean® Fecal DNA Isolation Kit (kit U) and PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit (kit P)) were evaluated, using human faecal samples. Yield, purity and integrity of total genomic DNA were compared spectrophotometrically and using gel electrophoresis. Three bacteria, commonly found in human faeces were quantified using real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and total bacterial diversity was studied using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) as well as terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). The measurements of DNA yield and purity exhibited variations between the five kits tested in this study. Automated kit QS exhibited the best quality and highest quantity of DNA. All kits were shown to be reproducible with CV values≤0.46 for DNA extraction. qPCR results showed that all kits were uniformly efficient for extracting DNA from the selected target bacteria. DGGE and T-RFLP produced the highest diversity scores for DNA extracted using kit Z (H'=2.30 and 1.27) and kit QS (H'=2.16 and 0.94), which also extracted the highest DNA yields compared to the other kits assessed.
Keywords: Bacteria; DGGE; DNA extraction; Faeces; Real-time PCR; T-RFLP.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extraction.BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jan 21;7:50. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-50. BMC Res Notes. 2014. PMID: 24447346 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils.Can J Microbiol. 2011 Aug;57(8):623-8. doi: 10.1139/w11-049. Epub 2011 Aug 4. Can J Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21815819
-
Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens.Nutr J. 2010 May 22;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-23. Nutr J. 2010. PMID: 20492702 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of DNA/RNA yield and integrity between PMAP36-mediated and other bacterial lysis methods.J Microbiol Methods. 2022 Feb;193:106396. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106396. Epub 2021 Dec 16. J Microbiol Methods. 2022. PMID: 34921868 Review.
-
Comparison of the techniques for isolating immunoassay-suitable proteins from heterogeneous fecal samples.Anal Biochem. 2025 Mar;698:115748. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2024.115748. Epub 2024 Dec 10. Anal Biochem. 2025. PMID: 39667549 Review.
Cited by
-
Standardization of gut microbiome analysis in sports.Cell Rep Med. 2024 Oct 15;5(10):101759. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101759. Epub 2024 Oct 4. Cell Rep Med. 2024. PMID: 39368478 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A hybrid DNA extraction method for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of bacterial communities from poultry production samples.J Vis Exp. 2014 Dec 10;(94):52161. doi: 10.3791/52161. J Vis Exp. 2014. PMID: 25548939 Free PMC article.
-
Profiling soil microbial communities with next-generation sequencing: the influence of DNA kit selection and technician technical expertise.PeerJ. 2017 Dec 19;5:e4178. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4178. eCollection 2017. PeerJ. 2017. PMID: 29302394 Free PMC article.
-
SalmoSim: the development of a three-compartment in vitro simulator of the Atlantic salmon GI tract and associated microbial communities.Microbiome. 2021 Aug 31;9(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01134-6. Microbiome. 2021. PMID: 34465363 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods for Reliable Quantification of Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Biosensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 6;13(4):463. doi: 10.3390/bios13040463. Biosensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37185538 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bahl M.I., Bergström A., Licht T.R. Freezing fecal samples prior to DNA extraction affects the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio determined by downstream quantitative PCR analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012;329(2):193–197. - PubMed
-
- Dave M., Higgins P.D., Middha S., Rioux K.P. The human gut microbiome: current knowledge, challenges, and future directions. Transl. Res. 2012;160(4):246–257. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials