Commercial landscape of noninvasive prenatal testing in the United States
- PMID: 23686656
- PMCID: PMC3898859
- DOI: 10.1002/pd.4101
Commercial landscape of noninvasive prenatal testing in the United States
Abstract
Cell-free fetal DNA-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) could significantly change the paradigm of prenatal testing and screening. Intellectual property (IP) and commercialization promise to be important components of the emerging debate about clinical implementation of these technologies. We have assembled information about types of testing, prices, turnaround times, and reimbursement of recently launched commercial tests in the United States from the trade press, news articles, and scientific, legal, and business publications. We also describe the patenting and licensing landscape of technologies underlying these tests and ongoing patent litigation in the United States. Finally, we discuss how IP issues may affect clinical translation of NIPT and their potential implications for stakeholders. Fetal medicine professionals (clinicians and researchers), genetic counselors, insurers, regulators, test developers, and patients may be able to use this information to make informed decisions about clinical implementation of current and emerging noninvasive prenatal tests.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests.
Figures

Comment in
-
Comment on "Commercial landscape of noninvasive prenatal testing in the United States".Prenat Diagn. 2013 Sep;33(9):913. doi: 10.1002/pd.4185. Prenat Diagn. 2013. PMID: 23996704 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:369-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-050000. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015. PMID: 26322648 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening and diagnostic strategies for Down syndrome: A microsimulation modeling analysis.PLoS One. 2019 Dec 4;14(12):e0225281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225281. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31800591 Free PMC article.
-
The continuing saga of patents and non-invasive prenatal testing.Prenat Diagn. 2019 May;39(6):441-447. doi: 10.1002/pd.5450. Epub 2019 Apr 26. Prenat Diagn. 2019. PMID: 30900262 Free PMC article.
-
The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.028. Epub 2014 Aug 30. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014. PMID: 25238658
-
Do recent US Supreme Court rulings on patenting of genes and genetic diagnostics affect the practice of genetic screening and diagnosis in prenatal and reproductive care?Prenat Diagn. 2014 Oct;34(10):921-6. doi: 10.1002/pd.4445. Epub 2014 Jul 31. Prenat Diagn. 2014. PMID: 24989832 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Monogenic Disorders Through Bayesian- and Haplotype-Based Prediction of Fetal Genotype.Front Genet. 2022 Jul 1;13:911369. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.911369. eCollection 2022. Front Genet. 2022. PMID: 35846127 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing in Ontario and Quebec: the role of governing style in health technology innovation & adoption.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 9;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09245-6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 36890546 Free PMC article.
-
Insurance and geographic variations in non-invasive prenatal testing.Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jul;42(8):1004-1007. doi: 10.1002/pd.6155. Epub 2022 May 1. Prenat Diagn. 2022. PMID: 35484945 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Expanding Use of cfDNA Screening in Pregnancy: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.Curr Genet Med Rep. 2017 Mar;5(1):44-53. doi: 10.1007/s40142-017-0113-x. Epub 2017 Feb 11. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2017. PMID: 38089918 Free PMC article.
-
Digynic triploidy: utility and challenges of noninvasive prenatal testing.Clin Case Rep. 2015 Jun;3(6):406-10. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.247. Epub 2015 Apr 9. Clin Case Rep. 2015. PMID: 26185638 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL, Redman CW, Wainscoat JS. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 1997;350:485–7. - PubMed
-
- Benn PA, Chapman AR. Practical and ethical considerations of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. JAMA. 2009;301(20):2154–56. - PubMed
-
- de Jong A, Dondorp WJ, Frints SG, de Die-Smulders CE, de Wert GM. Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(9):657–63. - PubMed
-
- Greely HT. Get ready for the flood of fetal gene screening. Nature. 2011;469:289–91. - PubMed
-
- Levenson D. Noninvasive prenatal tests for Down syndrome are near. AJMG. 2011;155A(6):fmvii–viiii. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical