Does laboratory automation for the preanalytical phase improve data quality?
- PMID: 23686657
- DOI: 10.1177/2211068213488892
Does laboratory automation for the preanalytical phase improve data quality?
Abstract
Our aim was to evaluate whether automation for the preanalytical phase improves data quality. Blood from 100 volunteers was collected into two vacuum tubes. One sample from each volunteer was respectively assigned to (G1) traditional processing, starting with centrifugation at 1200 g for 10 min, and (G2) the MODULAR PRE-ANALYTICALS EVO-MPA system. The routine clinical chemistry tests were performed in duplicate on the same instrument Cobas 6000 <c501> module. G1 samples were uncapped manually and immediately placed into the instrument. G2 samples were directly fed from the MPA system to the instrument without further staff intervention. At the end, (1) the G1 samples were stored for 6 h at 4 °C as prescribed in our accredited laboratory and (2) the G2 samples were stored for 6 h in the MPA output buffer. Results from G1 and G2, before and after storage, were compared. Significant increases were observed in G1 compared with G2 samples as follows: (1) before storage for alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), phosphate (P), magnesium (MG), iron (FE), and hemolysis index and (2) after storage for total cholesterol (COL), triglycerides (TG), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CRE), uric acid (UA), ALP, pancreatic amylase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), g-glutamyltransferase (GGT), LDH, creatine kinase (CK), calcium (CA), FE, sodium (NA), potassium (K), and hemolysis index. Moreover, significant increases were observed in (3) G1-after versus G1-before storage samples for COL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG, TP, ALB, BUN, CRE, UA, AST, ALT, GGT, LDH, P, CA, MG, FE, NA, K, and hemolysis index and (4) G2-after versus G2-before storage only for BUN, AST, LDH, P, and CA. In conclusion, our results show that the MPA system improves the quality of laboratory testing.
Keywords: preanalytical phase; reference values; reproducibility of results; specimen handing; vacuum tubes.
Similar articles
-
Non-homogeneous separation of triglycerides, gamma-glutamyltransferase, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase after centrifugation of lithium-heparin tubes.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(8):1180-2. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.237. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008. PMID: 18724811
-
Influence of a regular, standardized meal on clinical chemistry analytes.Ann Lab Med. 2012 Jul;32(4):250-6. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.4.250. Epub 2012 Jun 20. Ann Lab Med. 2012. PMID: 22779065 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(3):311-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.054. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006. PMID: 16519604
-
Managing hemolyzed samples in clinical laboratories.Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020 Jan;57(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1664391. Epub 2019 Oct 11. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020. PMID: 31603708 Review.
-
Quality specifications for the extra-analytical phase of laboratory testing: Reference intervals and decision limits.Clin Biochem. 2017 Jul;50(10-11):595-598. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Mar 31. Clin Biochem. 2017. PMID: 28366822 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of chemical preservative in urine samples.EJIFCC. 2020 Mar 20;31(1):56-64. eCollection 2020 Mar. EJIFCC. 2020. PMID: 32256289 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous