Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Jun;28(4):337-47.
doi: 10.1177/1533317513488910. Epub 2013 May 17.

Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic accuracy in Alzheimer's disease: a synthesis of existing evidence

Joseph E Gaugler  1 , Robert L Kane, Joseph A Johnston, Khaled Sarsour
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic accuracy in Alzheimer's disease: a synthesis of existing evidence

Joseph E Gaugler et al. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This report synthesizes existing evidence to compare the accuracy of various Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnostic approaches.

Design and methods: Meta-analyses and reviews of diagnostic accuracy of AD were identified through a search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using the keyword combinations of "sensitivity specificity Alzheimer's disease diagnosis" and "accuracy of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis."

Results: From 507 abstracts initially identified, 41 systematic reviews or meta-analyses were selected. Cerebrospinal fluid-tau demonstrated variable sensitivity (range 73.3%-100%) and specificity (range 70.0%-92.4%) in diagnosing AD when compared to neuropathological verification of clinical criteria for AD. Various positron emission tomography approaches showed a similar range of sensitivity (range 80.0%-100%) and specificity (range 62.0%-90%) as diagnostic protocols.

Implications: Issues that remain in the study of AD diagnosis include the need to determine the comparative effectiveness of diagnostic approaches. Variations in study quality make empirically derived conclusions about the diagnostic accuracy of existing approaches tenuous.

Keywords: clinical; dementia; meta-analysis; sensitivity; specificity; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: During the time this study was conducted, Dr Sarsour was an employee of Eli Lilly and Company.

References

    1. Khachaturian ZS, Khachaturian AS, Thies W. The draft “national plan” to address Alzheimer's disease—National Alzheimer’s Project Act (NAPA). Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8(3):234–236. - PubMed
    1. Alzheimer's Association. 2012 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8(2):131–168. - PubMed
    1. Bloudek LM, Spackman DE, Blankenburg M, Sullivan SD. Review and meta-analysis of biomarkers and diagnostic imaging in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(4):627–645. - PubMed
    1. Knopman DS, DeKosky ST, Cummings JL, et al. . Practice parameter: diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2001;56(9):1143–1153. - PubMed
    1. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer s Disease. Neurology. 1984;34(7):939–944. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources