Immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a randomized, controlled trial in adults
- PMID: 23688546
- PMCID: PMC3668902
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-224
Immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a randomized, controlled trial in adults
Abstract
Background: Two phylogenetic lineages of influenza B virus coexist and circulate in the human population (B/Yamagata and B/Victoria) but only one B-strain is included in each seasonal vaccine. Mismatch regularly occurs between the recommended and circulating B-strain. Inclusion of both lineages in vaccines may offer better protection against influenza.
Methods: This study (NCT00714285) assessed the immunogenicity and safety of two candidate quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV) containing two A- and two B-strains (one from each lineage) in adults (18-60 years). Subjects were randomized and stratified by age to receive either QIV (non-adjuvanted or low-dose adjuvanted [LD QIV-AS]) or trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV, non-adjuvanted or low-dose adjuvanted [LD TIV-AS]), N = 105 in all treatment groups. The study evaluated the statistical non-inferiority of the immunological response elicited by QIV and LD QIV-AS versus TIV and LD TIV-AS and the statistical superiority of the response elicited by the quadrivalent vaccines against the B-strain (B/Jiangsu) not included in the TIV.
Results: Pre-defined non-inferiority and superiority criteria were reached for both QIVs compared to the TIVs. On Day 21 in all vaccine groups SCRs were ≥54.8%, SPRs ≥88.5% and SCFs ≥5.4 for the A strains and B strain included in all vaccines (B/Malaysia). This fulfilled the European (CHMP) and the US (CBER) licensing criteria for the assessment of influenza vaccines in adults (CHMP criteria: SCR > 40%, SPR > 70%, SCF > 2; CBER criteria: LL of 95% CI for SPR ≥ 70% or SCR ≥ 40%). Only the QIVs met the CHMP and CBER criteria for the B/Jiangsu strain. In the QIV and LD-QIV-AS groups, the SCFs were 9.1 and 8.1, respectively and the SPRs were 98.1% and 95.2%, whereas for the TIV and LD-TIV-AS groups, the SCFs were 2.3 and 2.5, respectively, and the SPRs were 75.0% and 63.8%, with the LLs of the 95% CI <70% for SPR and <40% for SCR.
Conclusions: Addition of a fourth strain did not impact the immune response elicited by the three original strains contained in the TIV. A clear immunological benefit was seen with the QIV formulation for the second B-strain, indicating that quadrivalent vaccines could provide broader protection against influenza.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00714285.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine candidate versus inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized trial in adults aged ≥18 years.BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jul 24;13:343. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-343. BMC Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23883186 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Phase III randomised trial of the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated subunit influenza vaccine in adult and elderly subjects, assessing both anti-haemagglutinin and virus neutralisation antibody responses.Vaccine. 2018 Sep 25;36(40):6030-6038. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.043. Epub 2018 Apr 27. Vaccine. 2018. PMID: 29709447 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized trial of candidate inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine versus trivalent influenza vaccines in children aged 3-17 years.J Infect Dis. 2013 Jun 15;207(12):1878-87. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit091. Epub 2013 Mar 7. J Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23470848 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Immunogenicity of inacitivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine in adults aged 18-64 years: A systematic review and Meta-analysis].Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 10;39(12):1636-1641. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.12.019. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 30572392 Chinese.
-
Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent and tetravalent influenza vaccines in children and adolescents.Vaccine. 2020 Feb 5;38(6):1332-1344. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.071. Epub 2020 Jan 14. Vaccine. 2020. PMID: 31948819 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the case for trivalent or quadrivalent influenza vaccines.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Oct 2;12(10):2712-2717. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1091130. Epub 2016 Jul 19. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016. PMID: 27435025 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influenza vaccination in oncology patients.Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013 Dec;15(6):486-90. doi: 10.1007/s11908-013-0368-7. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013. PMID: 24258350
-
A prospective study to assess the burden of influenza-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits among children in Bilbao, Spain (2010-2011).An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2017 Dec;87(6):311-319. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 16. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2017. PMID: 32289043 Free PMC article.
-
Immunogenicity and Safety of an Adjuvanted Herpes Zoster Subunit Vaccine Coadministered With Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older.J Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 12;216(11):1352-1361. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix481. J Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 29029224 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Active surveillance of 2017 seasonal influenza vaccine safety: an observational cohort study of individuals aged 6 months and older in Australia.BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e023263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023263. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30341132 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barr IG, Komadina N, Durrant C, Sjogren H, Hurt AC, Shaw RP. Circulation and antigenic drift in human influenza B viruses in SE Asia and Oceania since 2000. Commun Dis Intell. 2006;30:350–357. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
