Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Sep;62(3):205-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 May 18.

Comparison of electronic pharmacy prescription records with manually collected medication histories in an emergency department

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of electronic pharmacy prescription records with manually collected medication histories in an emergency department

Kin Wah Fung et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Study objective: Medication history is an essential part of patient assessment in emergency care. Patient-reported medication history can be incomplete. We study whether an electronic pharmacy-sourced prescription record can supplement the patient-reported history.

Methods: In a community hospital, we compared the patient-reported history obtained by triage nurses to a proprietary electronic pharmacy record in all emergency department (ED) patients during 3 months.

Results: Of 9,426 triaged patients, 5,001 (53%) had at least 1 (mean 7.7) prescription medication in the full-year electronic pharmacy record. Counting only recent prescription medications (supply lasting to at least 7 days before the ED visit), 3,688 patients (39%) had at least 1 (mean 4.0) recent medication. After adjustment for possible false-positive results, recent electronic prescription medication record enriched the patient-reported history by 28% (adding 1.1 drugs per patient). However, only 60% of patients with any active prescription medications from either source had any recent prescription medications in their electronic pharmacy record.

Conclusion: The electronic pharmacy prescription record augments the manually collected history.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dispensing of each medication over time. Each red, horizontal line represents a single new prescription or refill, and its length represents the calculated duration of the supply dispensed. We considered any medication with a duration line that crossed the blue dashed vertical line (end of supply is within 7 days of ED visit) to be a recent medication. The document lists the prescribers for each medication. This example patient had 6 different prescribers (fictitious names shown), 13 medications of which the first 3 were considered recent. This report is produced by the NLM/Health Level Seven server and is not the native report delivered by Surescripts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overlap among patients with an ED history (red circle), a recent electronic history (blue circle), and a full-year electronic history (yellow circle) for prescription medications.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Overhage JM, Dexter PR, Perkins SM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of clinical information shared from another institution. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:14–23. - PubMed
    1. Joint Commission [Accessed January 2, 2013];Revised NPSG on medication reconciliation is approved. Follow-up survey on Universal Protocol reveals widespread support Dec 8, 2010. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org.
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [Accessed January 2, 2013];Electronic health record incentive program—stage 2. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprog....
    1. Mersfelder TL, Bickel RJ. Inpatient medication history verification by pharmacy students. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65:2273–2275. - PubMed
    1. Lau HS, Florax C, Porsius AJ, et al. The completeness of medication histories in hospital medical records of patients admitted to general internal medicine wards. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;49:597–603. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms