Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jun;10(6):334-43.
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.64. Epub 2013 May 21.

Lung cancer chemoprevention: current status and future prospects

Affiliations
Review

Lung cancer chemoprevention: current status and future prospects

Robert L Keith et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, making it an attractive disease for chemoprevention. Although avoidance of tobacco use and smoking cessation will have the greatest impact on lung cancer development, chemoprevention could prove to be very effective, particularly in former smokers. Chemoprevention is the use of agents to reverse or inhibit carcinogenesis and has been successfully applied to other common malignancies. Despite prior studies in lung cancer chemoprevention failing to identify effective agents, we now have the ability to identify high-risk populations, and our understanding of lung tumour and premalignant biology continues to advance. There are distinct histological lesions that can be reproducibly graded as precursors of non-small-cell lung cancer and similar precursor lesions exist for adenocarcinoma. These premalignant lesions are being targeted by chemopreventive agents in current trials and will continue to be studied in the future. In addition, biomarkers that predict risk and response to targeted agents are being investigated and validated. In this Review, we discuss the principles of chemoprevention, data from preclinical models, completed clinical trials and observational studies, and describe new treatments for novel targeted pathways and future chemopreventive efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

R. L. Keith declares an association with the following companies: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer. R. L. Keith and Y. E. Miller declare an association with Bayer–Schering. See the article online for full details of the relationship.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential tobacco smoke induced carcinogenic processes for chemopreventive intervention. Hallmarks in the development of squamous-cell lung cancer as the bronchial epithelium proceeds through pathological stages in the progression to CIS. Tobacco cessation and chemopreventive agents can promote repair and block progression. Abbreviation: CIS, carcinoma in situ.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic pathway of the cyclooxygenase pathway showing conversion of arachidonic acid to prostanoids. The fatty acid arachidonic acid is released from the membrane phospholipids by several forms of phospholipase A2, which have previously been activated by one of a range of stimuli. The free arachidonic acid is converted to the cyclic endoperoxides prostaglandin G2 and prostaglandin H2 by the sequential COX and HOX actions of PGHS-1 or PGHS-2; these isoforms both have dual COX and HOX activity. Aspirin inhibits the conversion of free arachidonic acid to prostaglandin G2 by inhibiting the COX activity of PGHS-1 or PGHS-2. Prostaglandin H2 is converted into a range of prostanoids by tissue-specific isomerases; therefore, the inhibition of this pathway prevents (or reduces) the downstream activation of a superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors by these prostanoids. Prostacyclin binds to both a transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor and to PPARγ, a nuclear receptor. Abbreviations: ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; COX, cyclooxygenase; HOX, hydroperoxidase; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PGHS, prostaglandin H synthase; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ.

References

    1. Sporn MB. Approaches to prevention of epithelial cancer during the preneoplastic period. Cancer Res. 1976;36:2699–2702. - PubMed
    1. Spitz MR, et al. A risk model for prediction of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:715–726. - PubMed
    1. Bach PB, et al. Variations in lung cancer risk among smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:470–478. - PubMed
    1. Anthonisen NR, et al. The effects of a smoking cessation intervention on 14.5-year mortality: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:233–239. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances