Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jul;10(7):411-24.
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.79. Epub 2013 May 21.

Charged particle therapy--optimization, challenges and future directions

Affiliations
Review

Charged particle therapy--optimization, challenges and future directions

Jay S Loeffler et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

The use of charged particle therapy to control tumours non-invasively offers advantages over conventional radiotherapy. Protons and heavy ions deposit energy far more selectively than X-rays, allowing a higher local control of the tumour, a lower probability of damage to healthy tissue, low risk of complications and the chance for a rapid recovery after therapy. Charged particles are also useful for treating tumours located in areas that surround tissues that are radiosensitive and in anatomical sites where surgical access is limited. Current trial outcomes indicate that accelerated ions can potentially replace surgery for radical cancer treatments, which might be beneficial as the success of surgical cancer treatments are largely dependent on the expertise and experience of the surgeon and the location of the tumour. However, to date, only a small number of controlled randomized clinical trials have made comparisons between particle therapy and X-rays. Therefore, although the potential advantages are clear and supported by data, the cost:benefit ratio remains controversial. Research in medical physics and radiobiology is focusing on reducing the costs and increasing the benefits of this treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anticancer Res. 2013 Mar;33(3):747-54 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Feb 20;105(4):256-65 - PubMed
    1. BMC Cancer. 2010 Nov 05;10:606 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):756-60 - PubMed
    1. Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1716-27 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources