Barriers to breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care: perceptions of primary care physicians and medical oncologists in the United States
- PMID: 23690429
- PMCID: PMC3677841
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.6954
Barriers to breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care: perceptions of primary care physicians and medical oncologists in the United States
Abstract
Purpose: High-quality, well-coordinated cancer survivorship care is needed yet barriers remain owing to fragmentation in the United States health care system. This article is a nationwide survey of barriers perceived by primary care physicians (PCPs) and medical oncologists (MOs) regarding breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care beyond 5 years after treatment.
Methods: The Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors was mailed out in 2009 to a nationally-representative sample (n = 3,596) of US PCPs and MOs. Ten physician-perceived cancer survivorship care barriers/concerns were compared between the two provider types. Using weighted multinomial logistic regression, we modeled each barrier, adjusting for physician demographics, reimbursement, training, and practice characteristics.
Results: We received responses from 2,202 physicians (1,072 PCPs; 1,130 MOs; 65.1% cooperation rate). In adjusted patient-related barriers models, MOs were more likely than PCPs to report patient language barriers (odds ratio, [OR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.42), insurance restrictions impeding test/treatment use (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.96), and patients requesting more aggressive testing (OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 2.73 to 6.10). In adjusted physician-related barriers models, PCPs were more likely to report inadequate training (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 2.03 to 4.61) and ordering additional tests/treatments because of malpractice concerns (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.20 to 2.93). MOs were more likely to report uncertainty regarding general preventive care responsibility (often/always: OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.43; sometimes: OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.93).
Conclusion: MOs and PCPs perceive different cancer follow-up care barriers/concerns to be problematic. Resolving inadequate training, malpractice-driven test ordering, and preventive-care responsibility concerns may require continuing education, explicit guidelines, and survivorship care plans. Reviewing care plans with survivors may also reduce patients' requests for unnecessary testing.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Comment in
-
Is it better to transfer long-term cancer survivors to general practitioners or develop clinics for long-term survivors within the cancer centers?J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 20;32(3):257. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.5865. Epub 2013 Dec 2. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24297952 No abstract available.
-
Reply to U. Tirelli et al.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 20;32(3):258. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.7622. Epub 2013 Dec 2. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24297957 No abstract available.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2012. Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Facts & Figures, 2012-2013.
-
- Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, et al. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition.
-
- Hewitt M, Ganz PA. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007. Implementing Cancer Survivorship Care Planning-Workshop Summary.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
