The case for open preprints in biology
- PMID: 23690752
- PMCID: PMC3653830
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001563
The case for open preprints in biology
Abstract
Biologists should submit their preprints to open servers, a practice common in mathematics and physics, to open and accelerate the scientific process.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: Ethan White is an academic editor for PeerJ and Timothée Poisot is a member of the figshare advisors program.
Figures
References
-
- Loman N (2012) All the cool kids are on arXiv and Haldane's Sieve… why you should be too. Available: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/blog/2012/10/all-the-cool-kids-are-on-ar.... Accessed 14 April 2013.
-
- Ginsparg P (2011) ArXiv at 20. Nature 476: 145–147. - PubMed
-
- Krugman P (2012) Open science and the econoblogosphere. Available: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/open-science-and-the-econobl.... Accessed 14 April 2013.
-
- Brown C (2012) A good way to publish – arXiv FTW. Available: http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/science-f-yeah.html. Accessed 14 April 2013.
-
- Prakasan E, Sagar A, Kalyane V, Kumar A, Harnad S (2005) Minimum impact and immediacy of citations to physics open archives of arXiv.org: Science Citation Index based reports. CogPrints 4272.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
