Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 16;8(5):e64099.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064099. Print 2013.

A bayesian approach to genome/linguistic relationships in native South Americans

Affiliations

A bayesian approach to genome/linguistic relationships in native South Americans

Carlos Eduardo Guerra Amorim et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The relationship between the evolution of genes and languages has been studied for over three decades. These studies rely on the assumption that languages, as many other cultural traits, evolve in a gene-like manner, accumulating heritable diversity through time and being subjected to evolutionary mechanisms of change. In the present work we used genetic data to evaluate South American linguistic classifications. We compared discordant models of language classifications to the current Native American genome-wide variation using realistic demographic models analyzed under an Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) framework. Data on 381 STRs spread along the autosomes were gathered from the literature for populations representing the five main South Amerindian linguistic groups: Andean, Arawakan, Chibchan-Paezan, Macro-Jê, and Tupí. The results indicated a higher posterior probability for the classification proposed by J.H. Greenberg in 1987, although L. Campbell's 1997 classification cannot be ruled out. Based on Greenberg's classification, it was possible to date the time of Tupí-Arawakan divergence (2.8 kya), and the time of emergence of the structure between present day major language groups in South America (3.1 kya).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Alternative demographic models tested against the genetic variation in 381 autosomal STRs.
Parameters are explained in Table 1. Current average deme size (NP) and gene flow (m) between populations are not shown.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Prior (black), posterior (red) and retained (blue) simulations distributions of time (in generations) and size (2n) of parameters of the demographic model based on Greenberg's language classification.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Quantile distributions (x-axis) of the known parameter values as inferred from the posterior distributions for 1,000 pseudo-observed data sets generated under Greenberg's model.

References

    1. Reali F, Griffiths TL (2010) Words as alleles: Connecting language evolution with Bayesian learners to models of genetic drift. Proc R Soc B 277: 429–436. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunley K, Bowern C, Healy M (2012) Rejection of a serial founder effects model of genetic and linguistic coevolution. Proc R Soc B 279: 2281–2288. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salzano FM, Hutz MH, Salamoni SP, Rohr P, Callegari-Jacques SM (2005) Genetic support for proposed patterns of relationship among Lowland South American languages. Curr Anthropol 46: S121–S129.
    1. Richerson PJ, Boyd R, Henrich J (2010) Gene-culture coevolution in the age of genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 8985–8992. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perreault C (2012) The pace of cultural evolution. PLoS One 7: e45150. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources