Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Oct;88(4):532-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

Racial and ethnic differences in men's knowledge and attitudes about contraception

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Racial and ethnic differences in men's knowledge and attitudes about contraception

Sonya Borrero et al. Contraception. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about racial/ethnic differences in men's contraceptive knowledge and attitudes.

Study design: We used multivariable logistic regression to examine racial/ethnic differences in contraceptive knowledge and attitudes among 903 men aged 18-29 in the 2009 National Survey of Reproductive and Contraceptive Knowledge.

Results: Black and Hispanic men were less likely than Whites to have heard of most contraceptive methods, including female and male sterilization, and also had lower knowledge about hormonal and long-acting reversible methods. They were less likely to know that pills are ineffective when 2-3 pills are missed [Blacks: adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.42; Hispanics: aOR=0.53] and that fertility was not delayed after stopping the pill (Blacks: aOR=0.52; Hispanics: aOR=0.27). Hispanics were less likely to know that nulliparous women can use the intrauterine device (aOR=0.47). Condom knowledge was similar by race/ethnicity, but Blacks were less likely to view condoms as a hassle than Whites (aOR=0.46).

Conclusions: Efforts to educate men, especially men of color, about contraceptive methods are needed.

Keywords: Attitudes; Contraception; Disparities; Knowledge; Men; Race.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest, financial or other, exists for any of the authors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Abortion surveillance: United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2011;60:1–42. - PubMed
    1. Finer L, Zolna M. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011;84:478–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamilton BE, SJV Birth rates for U.S. teenagers reach historical lows for all age and ethnic groups. National Center for Health Statistics. 2012;89:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Jones J, Mosher W, Daniels K. Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006–2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995. National Health Statistics Reports. 2012 - PubMed
    1. Dehlendorf C, Foster D, de Bocanegra H, Brindis C, Bradsberry M, Darney P. Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2011–2007. Perspect Sex and Reprod Health. 2011;43:181–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types