Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Oct;38(5):394-400.
doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12074. Epub 2013 May 24.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin injection in healthy Chinese volunteers and dosing regimen optimization

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin injection in healthy Chinese volunteers and dosing regimen optimization

G Cao et al. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

What is known and objective: The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of levofloxacin were investigated following administration of levofloxacin injection in healthy Chinese volunteers for optimizing dosing regimen.

Methods: The PK study included single-dose (750 mg/150 mL) and multiple-dose (750 mg/150 mL once daily for 7 days) phases. The concentration of levofloxacin in blood and urine was determined using HPLC method. Both non-compartmental and compartmental analyses were performed to estimate PK parameters. Taking fC(max) /MIC ≥5 and fAUC(24 h) /MIC ≥30 as a target, the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of levofloxacin 750 mg for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) was calculated using Monte Carlo simulation. The probability of target attainment (PTA) of levofloxacin at various minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) was also evaluated.

Results and discussion: The results of PK study showed that the C(max) and AUC(0-∞) of levofloxacin were 14·94 μg/mL and 80·14 μg h/mL following single-dose infusion of levofloxacin. The half-life and average cumulative urine excretion ratio within 72 h post-dosing were 7·75 h and 86·95%, respectively. The mean C(ss,max), C(ss,min) and AUC(0-τ) of levofloxacin at steady state following multiple doses were 13·31 μg/mL, 0·031 μg/mL and 103·7 μg h/mL, respectively. The accumulation coefficient was 1·22. PK/PD analysis revealed that the CFR value of levofloxacin 750-mg regimen against Streptococcus pneumoniae was 96·2% and 95·4%, respectively, in terms of fC(max) /MIC and fAUC/MIC targets.

What is new and conclusion: The regimen of 750-mg levofloxacin once daily provides a satisfactory PK/PD profile against the main pathogenic bacteria of CAP, which implies promising clinical and bacteriological efficacy for patients with CAP. A large-scale clinical study is warranted to confirm these results.

Keywords: Monte Carlo simulation; healthy volunteer; levofloxacin; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Concentration–time profiles of levofloxacin following single- or multiple-dose infusion of 750-mg levofloxacin in healthy Chinese volunteers (Mean ± SD, = 9). The observed values and fittings obtained from two-compartment model were represented by dots and lines, whereas red and blue symbols represent single-dose PK group and multiple-dose PK group, respectively. The infusion time of single-dose levofloxacin was 1·5 h. The dosing regimen for multiple PK study was q24 h × 7 days.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Cumulative fraction of response of fCmax/MIC (a) and fAUC24 h/MIC (b) for levofloxacin. The dosing regimen of levofloxacin was 500 mg or 750 mg (q.d.) for seven consecutive days, and f indicates the unbound fraction, the value of which was 0·7.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Distribution of CAP pathogens in terms of MIC level and the PTA of fCmax/MIC (a) and fAUC24 h/MIC (b) for levofloxacin following multiple dosing. The dosing regimen of levofloxacin was 500 mg or 750 mg (q.d.) for 7 consecutive days, and f indicates the unbound fraction, the value of which was 0·7. Histograms and lines represent the distribution frequency of MIC and PTA values, respectively. In the graph, the distribution data of MIC for CAP pathogens were obtained from the literature.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang F, Zhang Y, editors. Practical antimicrobial therapeutics. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2004.
    1. Friedman H, Song X, Crespi S, Navaratnam P. Comparative analysis of length of stay, total costs, and treatment success between intravenous moxifloxacin 400 mg and levofloxacin 750 mg among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Value Health. 2009;12:1135–1143. - PubMed
    1. Frei CR, Jaso TC, Mortensen EM, et al. Medical resource utilization among community-acquired pneumonia patients initially treated with levofloxacin 750 mg daily versus ceftriaxone 1000 mg plus azithromycin 500 mg daily: a US-based study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25:859–868. - PubMed
    1. Schein J, Janagap-Benson C, Grant R, Sikirica V, Doshi D, Olson W. A comparison of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin use in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients in the US: focus on length of stay. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:895–906. - PubMed
    1. Lynch JP, 3rd, File TM, Jr, Zhanel GG. Levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2006;4:725–742. - PubMed

Publication types