Pilot randomized controlled trial of web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation
- PMID: 23703730
- PMCID: PMC3768336
- DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntt056
Pilot randomized controlled trial of web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation
Abstract
Objective: Web-based smoking cessation interventions have high reach, but low effectiveness. To address this problem, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of the first web-based acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention for smoking cessation. The aims were to determine design feasibility, user receptivity, effect on 30-day point prevalence quit rate at 3 months post-randomization, and mediation by ACT theory-based processes of acceptance.
Methods: Adult participants were recruited nationally into the double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial (N = 222), which compared web-based ACT for smoking cessation (WebQuit.org) with the National Cancer Institute's Smokefree.gov-the U.S. national standard for web-based smoking cessation interventions.
Results: We recruited 222 participants in 10 weeks. Participants spent significantly longer on the ACT WebQuit.org site per login (18.98 vs. 10.72 min; p = .001) and were more satisfied with the site (74% vs. 42%; p =.002). Using available follow-up data, more than double the fraction of participants in the ACT WebQuit.org arm had quit smoking at the 3-month follow-up (23% vs. 10%; OR = 3.05; 95% CI = 1.01-9.32; p = .050). Eighty percent of this effect was mediated by ACT theory-based increases in total acceptance of physical, cognitive, and emotional cues to smoke (p < .001).
Conclusions: The trial design was feasible. Compared with Smokefree.gov, ACT had higher user receptivity and short-term cessation, and strong evidence of theory-based mechanisms of change. While results were promising, they were limited by the pilot design (e.g., limited follow-up), and thus a full-scale efficacy trial is now being conducted.
References
-
- An L. C., Betzner A., Schillo B., Luxenberg M. G., Christenson M., Wendling A., … Kavanaugh A. (2010). The comparative effectiveness of clinic, work-site, phone, and Web-based tobacco treatment programs. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12, 989–996.10.1093/ntr/ntq133 - PubMed
-
- Barnes S. A., Larsen M. D., Schroeder D., Hanson A., Decker P. A. (2010). Missing data assumptions and methods in a smoking cessation study. Addiction, 105, 431–437 - PubMed
-
- Berg C. J. (2011). Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation show inconsistent effects across trials, with only some trials showing a benefit. Evidence-based Nursing, 14, 47–48.10.1136/ebn.14.2.47 - PubMed
-
- Bond F. W., Bunce D. (2000). Mediators of change in emotion-focused and problem-focused worksite stress management interventions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 156–163 - PubMed
-
- Borrelli B., Spring B., Niaura R., Hitsman B., Papandonatos G. (2001). Influences of gender and weight gain on short-term relapse to smoking in a cessation trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 511–515 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
