Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;57(4):555-61.
doi: 10.1093/cid/cit346. Epub 2013 May 23.

Is fidaxomicin worth the cost? An economic analysis

Affiliations

Is fidaxomicin worth the cost? An economic analysis

Sarah M Bartsch et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Background: In May 2011, the Food and Drug Administration approved fidaxomicin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). It has been found to be noninferior to vancomycin; however, its cost-effectiveness for the treatment of CDI remains undetermined.

Methods: We developed a decision analytic simulation model to determine the economic value of fidaxomicin for CDI treatment from the third-party payer perspective. We looked at CDI treatment in these 3 cases: (1) no fidaxomicin, (2) only fidaxomicin, and (3) fidaxomicin based on strain typing results.

Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for fidaxomicin based on screening given current conditions was >$43.7 million per quality-adjusted life-year and using only fidaxomicin was dominated (ie, more costly and less effective) by the other 2 treatment strategies explored. The fidaxomicin strategy tended to remain dominated, even at lower costs. With approximately 50% of CDI due to the NAP1/BI/027 strain, a course of fidaxomicin would need to cost ≤$150 to be cost-effective in the treatment of all CDI cases and between $160 and $400 to be cost-effective for those with a non-NAP1/BI/027 strain (ie, treatment based on strain typing).

Conclusions: Given the current cost and NAP1/BI/027 accounting for approximately 50% of isolates, using fidaxomicin as a first-line treatment for CDI is not cost-effective. However, typing and treatment with fidaxomicin based on strain may be more promising depending on the costs of fidaxomicin.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile; cost; economics; fidaxomicin; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Model outline. Abbreviation: CDI, Clostridium difficile infection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Net benefit region graph identifying the optimal or most effective Clostridium difficile infection treatment strategy with a $50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) threshold for various costs of the full course of fidaxomicin when (A) the probability of the NAP1/BI/027 strain varied, and (B) the recurrence rate for the NAP1/BI/027 strain after treatment with fidaxomicin varied. The region shows the treatment strategy that “buys” the most QALYs for $50 000 (this is not necessarily the most cost-effective, ie, does not necessarily have the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio). Abbreviation: CDI, Clostridium difficile infection.

Comment in

References

    1. McGlone SM, Bailey RR, Zimmer SM, et al. The economic burden of Clostridium difficile. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;18:282–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly CP, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile—more difficult than ever. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1932–40. - PubMed
    1. Heinlen L, Ballard JD. Clostridium difficile infection. Am J Med Sci. 2010;340:247–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson S. Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: causality and therapeutic approaches. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;33:S33–6. - PubMed
    1. Gerding DN, Muto CA, Owens RCJ. Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:S32–42. - PubMed

Publication types