Is fidaxomicin worth the cost? An economic analysis
- PMID: 23704121
- PMCID: PMC3719891
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit346
Is fidaxomicin worth the cost? An economic analysis
Abstract
Background: In May 2011, the Food and Drug Administration approved fidaxomicin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). It has been found to be noninferior to vancomycin; however, its cost-effectiveness for the treatment of CDI remains undetermined.
Methods: We developed a decision analytic simulation model to determine the economic value of fidaxomicin for CDI treatment from the third-party payer perspective. We looked at CDI treatment in these 3 cases: (1) no fidaxomicin, (2) only fidaxomicin, and (3) fidaxomicin based on strain typing results.
Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for fidaxomicin based on screening given current conditions was >$43.7 million per quality-adjusted life-year and using only fidaxomicin was dominated (ie, more costly and less effective) by the other 2 treatment strategies explored. The fidaxomicin strategy tended to remain dominated, even at lower costs. With approximately 50% of CDI due to the NAP1/BI/027 strain, a course of fidaxomicin would need to cost ≤$150 to be cost-effective in the treatment of all CDI cases and between $160 and $400 to be cost-effective for those with a non-NAP1/BI/027 strain (ie, treatment based on strain typing).
Conclusions: Given the current cost and NAP1/BI/027 accounting for approximately 50% of isolates, using fidaxomicin as a first-line treatment for CDI is not cost-effective. However, typing and treatment with fidaxomicin based on strain may be more promising depending on the costs of fidaxomicin.
Keywords: Clostridium difficile; cost; economics; fidaxomicin; treatment.
Figures
Comment in
-
An economic analysis: is fidaxomicin worth the cost?Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;58(4):603-4. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit773. Epub 2013 Dec 2. Clin Infect Dis. 2014. PMID: 24300041 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to Simon, Shah et al, and Hartzema and Chen.Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;58(4):605-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit775. Epub 2013 Dec 2. Clin Infect Dis. 2014. PMID: 24300044 No abstract available.
-
Is fidaxomicin worth the cost? The verdict is still out!Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;58(4):604-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit774. Epub 2013 Dec 2. Clin Infect Dis. 2014. PMID: 24300046 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kelly CP, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile—more difficult than ever. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1932–40. - PubMed
-
- Johnson S. Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: causality and therapeutic approaches. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;33:S33–6. - PubMed
-
- Gerding DN, Muto CA, Owens RCJ. Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:S32–42. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
