Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 May 21;19(19):2864-82.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2864.

Herbal hepatotoxicity: challenges and pitfalls of causality assessment methods

Affiliations
Review

Herbal hepatotoxicity: challenges and pitfalls of causality assessment methods

Rolf Teschke et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

The diagnosis of herbal hepatotoxicity or herb induced liver injury (HILI) represents a particular clinical and regulatory challenge with major pitfalls for the causality evaluation. At the day HILI is suspected in a patient, physicians should start assessing the quality of the used herbal product, optimizing the clinical data for completeness, and applying the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) scale for initial causality assessment. This scale is structured, quantitative, liver specific, and validated for hepatotoxicity cases. Its items provide individual scores, which together yield causality levels of highly probable, probable, possible, unlikely, and excluded. After completion by additional information including raw data, this scale with all items should be reported to regulatory agencies and manufacturers for further evaluation. The CIOMS scale is preferred as tool for assessing causality in hepatotoxicity cases, compared to numerous other causality assessment methods, which are inferior on various grounds. Among these disputed methods are the Maria and Victorino scale, an insufficiently qualified, shortened version of the CIOMS scale, as well as various liver unspecific methods such as the ad hoc causality approach, the Naranjo scale, the World Health Organization (WHO) method, and the Karch and Lasagna method. An expert panel is required for the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network method, the WHO method, and other approaches based on expert opinion, which provide retrospective analyses with a long delay and thereby prevent a timely assessment of the illness in question by the physician. In conclusion, HILI causality assessment is challenging and is best achieved by the liver specific CIOMS scale, avoiding pitfalls commonly observed with other approaches.

Keywords: Causality assessment; Drug hepatotoxicity; Drug induced liver injury; Herb induced liver injury; Herbal hepatotoxicity; Herbs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Teschke R, Wolff A, Frenzel C, Schulze J, Eickhoff A. Herbal hepatotoxicity: a tabular compilation of reported cases. Liver Int. 2012;32:1543–1556. - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH launches free database of drugs associated with liver injury. [cited 2013 Feb 10] Available from: http://www.nih.gov/news/health/oct2012/niddk-12.htm.
    1. Available from: http://www.livertox.nih.gov/Herbals_and_Dietary_Supplements.htm.
    1. Teschke R, Frenzel C, Glass X, Schulze J, Eickhoff A. Herbal hepatotoxicity: a critical review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75:630–636. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2003/9241546271.pdf.

Substances