Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 21;8(5):e62642.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062642. Print 2013.

Interaction between IGF-IR and ER induced by E2 and IGF-I

Affiliations

Interaction between IGF-IR and ER induced by E2 and IGF-I

Zhenghong Yu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Estrogen receptor (ER) is a nuclear receptor and the insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor (IGF-IR) is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor. Estrogen and IGF-I are known to have synergistic effects on the growth of breast cancer cells. Recently, non-nuclear effects of ER have been under investigation. To study the mechanism involved in this process, we have used MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines transfected with IGF-IR anti-sense cDNA (SX13, MCF-7(SX13)) that resulted in 50% reduction of IGF-IR. In MCF-7 cells, estradiol (E2) and IGF-I induced the rapid association of ER to IGF-IR, however, the interaction was abrogated in MCF-7(SX13) cells. In addition, NWTB3 cells (NIH3T3 cells overexpressing IGF-IR) were transiently transfected with ERα, the ER-IGF-IR interaction was induced by both E2 and IGF-I. Moreover, ERα regulated the IGF-I signaling pathways through phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Akt and the interaction of ER-IGF-IR potentiated the cell growth. Finally, E2 and IGF-I stimulated translocation of ER from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Taken together, these findings reveal that the interaction of the ER and IGF-IR is important for the non-genomic effects of ER.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Binding of IGF-IR to ERα is stimulated by IGF-I in MCF-7 cells.
MCF-7 cells were stimulated with 10 nM IGF-I for 0, 5, 15, 30, or 60 min. Protein lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with IGF-IR antibody and subsequently immunoblotted with ERα antibody (A) or immunoprecipitation with ERα antibody and subsequently immunoblotted with IGF-IR antibody (B). The ratio of ERα and IGF-IR rapidly increased from 0 to 15 min, and reached peak at 15 min and gradually decreased from 30 to 60 min (A). Also, the ratio of IGF-IR and ERα rapidly increased from 0 to 15 min, and reached peak at 15 min and gradually decreased from 30 to 60 min (B). N = 3, *, P<0.05 as compared to 0 min.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Binding IGF-IR to ERα is abrogated by IGF-I in MCF-7SX13 cells.
MCF-7SX13 cells were stimulated with 10 nM IGF-I for 0–60 min. Protein lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with IGF-IR (A) or ERα (B) antibodies with subsequent immunoblotting of the precipitated fraction with ERα antibody (A) or IGF-IR antibody (B), respectively. The ratios of ERα/IGF-IR and IGF-IR/ERα at different time points were similar to each other, N = 3, P>0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Binding of IGF-IR to ERα is stimulated by IGF-I or E2 in NWTB3 cells.
NWTB3 cells transiently transfected with ERα were stimulated with 10 nM IGF-I or 10 nM E2 for 0–4 h. (A) Protein lysates were subjected to either immunoblotting with ERα antibody for determination of the expression of ERα or immunoprecipitated with IGF-IR antibody with subsequent immunoblotting of the precipitated fraction with ERα antibody. (B) The ratio of ERα/IGF-IR rapidly increased from 0 to 4 h, reached peak at 1 h after IGF-I stimulation, meanwhile, E2 treatment also enhanced the ratio with the peak at 1 h. C, NIH3T3 cells without ERα cDNA transfection. N = 3, *, P<0.05 as compared to the control groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4. ERα potentiates the basal and maximum phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Akt by IGF-I stimulation.
NWTB3 cells transfected with ERα or vector control were stimulated with 10 nM IGF-I for 0–60 min. (A) Protein lysates were immunoblotted with phospho-ERK1/2, ERK1/2, phospho-Akt, Akt, or ERα antibodies. Transfection of ERα gradually increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Akt after IGF-I stimulation. (B) The ratios of p-ERK1/2 vs. ERK1/2. The maximum phospho-ERK1/2 appeared in 5 min in ERα transfected NWTB3 cells after IGF-I stimulation, while it was 15 min in ERα-negative control cells. (C) The ratios of p-Akt vs. Akt. The maximum of phosphorylation of Akt was at 15 min in ERα-positive cells, but at 60 min in ERα-negative cells. N = 3, *, P<0.05 as compared to controls.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Cell proliferation is enhanced in ERα-transfected NWTB3 cells by IGF-I stimulation.
To investigate the potential cross-talk between ER and IGF-IR on cellular proliferation, we used NWTB3 cells, which overexpress IGF-IR but are devoid of ER. These cells were transfected with ERα cDNA or vector control for 24 h and subsequently stimulated with 10 nM IGF-I for 48–72 h. In the presence of ER, cell proliferation was significantly increased after 48 and 72 h, respectively, as compared to cells without ER cDNA transfection. N = 3, *, P<0.05 as compare to cells without IGF-I treatment; #, P<0.05 as compare to the ERα-negative control groups.
Figure 6
Figure 6. E2 and IGF-I quickly stimulate GFP-ERα translocation from nucleus to cytoplasm in NWTB3 cells.
ER was mostly located in the nucleus in the non-treated control group, however, only a small part in the cytoplasm after E2 treatment (20 min). ER was significantly increased in the cytoplasm in IGF-I and IGF-I plus ER treatment groups (20 min).

References

    1. Contois LW, Nugent DP, Caron JM, Cretu A, Tweedie E, et al. (2010) Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 differentially inhibits growth factor-induced angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 287: 1779–89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker SE, Lorenzen JA, Miller SW, Bunch TA, Jannuzi AL, et al. (2002) Genetic interaction between integrins and moleskin, a gene encoding a Drosophila homolog of importin-7. Genetics 162: 285–96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kawabe Y, Kuwayama H, Morio T, Urushihara H, Tanaka Y (2002) A putative serpentine receptor gene tasA required for normal morphogenesis of primary stalk and branch structure in Polysphondylium pallidum. Gene 285: 291–9. - PubMed
    1. Stenoien DL, Mancini MG, Patel K, Allegretto EA, Smith CL, et al. (2000) Subnuclear trafficking of estrogen receptor-alpha and steroid receptor coactivator-1. Mol Endocrinol 14: 518–34. - PubMed
    1. Bartella V, De Marco P, Malaguarnera R, Belfiore A, Maggiolini M (2012) New advances on the functional cross-talk between insulin-like growth factor-I and estrogen signaling in cancer. Cell Signal 24: 1515–21. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources