Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 May 24:12:68.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-68.

Low glycaemic index diets improve glucose tolerance and body weight in women with previous history of gestational diabetes: a six months randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Low glycaemic index diets improve glucose tolerance and body weight in women with previous history of gestational diabetes: a six months randomized trial

Sangeetha Shyam et al. Nutr J. .

Abstract

Background: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) increases risks for type 2 diabetes and weight management is recommended to reduce the risk. Conventional dietary recommendations (energy-restricted, low fat) have limited success in women with previous GDM. The effect of lowering Glycaemic Index (GI) in managing glycaemic variables and body weight in women post-GDM is unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of conventional dietary recommendations administered with and without additional low-GI education, in the management of glucose tolerance and body weight in Asian women with previous GDM.

Method: Seventy seven Asian, non-diabetic women with previous GDM, between 20- 40y were randomised into Conventional healthy dietary recommendation (CHDR) and low GI (LGI) groups. CHDR received conventional dietary recommendations only (energy restricted, low in fat and refined sugars, high-fibre). LGI group received advice on lowering GI in addition. Fasting and 2-h post-load blood glucose after 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (2HPP) were measured at baseline and 6 months after intervention. Anthropometry and dietary intake were assessed at baseline, three and six months after intervention. The study is registered at the Malaysian National Medical Research Register (NMRR) with Research ID: 5183.

Results: After 6 months, significant reductions in body weight, BMI and waist-to-hip ratio were observed only in LGI group (P<0.05). Mean BMI changes were significantly different between groups (LGI vs. CHDR: -0.6 vs. 0 kg/m2, P= 0.03). More subjects achieved weight loss ≥5% in LGI compared to CHDR group (33% vs. 8%, P=0.01). Changes in 2HPP were significantly different between groups (LGI vs. CHDR: median (IQR): -0.2(2.8) vs. +0.8 (2.0) mmol/L, P=0.025). Subjects with baseline fasting insulin≥2 μIU/ml had greater 2HPP reductions in LGI group compared to those in the CHDR group (-1.9±0.42 vs. +1.31±1.4 mmol/L, P<0.001). After 6 months, LGI group diets showed significantly lower GI (57±5 vs. 64±6, P<0.001), GL (122±33 vs. 142±35, P=0.04) and higher fibre content (17±4 vs.13±4 g, P<0.001). Caloric intakes were comparable between groups.

Conclusion: In women post-GDM, lowering GI of healthy diets resulted in significant improvements in glucose tolerance and body weight reduction as compared to conventional low-fat diets with similar energy prescription.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of the flow of participants. Legend: CHDR: Group receiving Conventional Healthy Dietary Recommendations Only: Low GI: Group receiving Conventional Healthy Dietary Recommendations +Low GI education, ITT: intent-to-treat analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage weight loss in study groups. Legend: LGI: Low GI Group, CHDR: Conventional healthy Dietary Recommendation Group, P value shown is calculated between the percentage of subjects in both groups using Fischer’s Exact test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage weight loss among subjects categorized by baseline fasting insulin levels. Legend: LGI: Low GI Group, CHDR: Conventional healthy Dietary Recommendation Group, P values for significance of changes between the diet groups are shown.
Figure 4
Figure 4
2H Post-75g oral glucose load blood glucose changes among subjects categorized by baseline fasting insulin (mmol/L). Legend: LGI: Low GI Group, CHDR: Conventional healthy Dietary Recommendation Group, P values for significance of changes between the diet groups are shown.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Baseline fasting insulin levels and 2HPP changes among dietary GI quartiles. Legend: Low INS: subjects with Baseline fasting INS < 2 uIU/L, High INS subjects with Baseline fasting INS ≥ 2 uIU/ml. Quartiles refer to dietary GI quartiles at 6 months.

References

    1. Ratner RE. Prevention of type 2 diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:S242–S245. doi: 10.2337/dc07-s223. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1862–1868. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1862. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, de Leiva A, Dunger DB, Hadden DR, Hod M, Kitzmiller JL, Kjos SL, Oats JN, Pettitt DJ, Sacks DA, Zoupas C. Summary and recommendations of the fifth international workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:S251–S260. doi: 10.2337/dc07-s225. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oldfield MD, Donley P, Walwyn L, Scudamore I, Gregory R. Long term prognosis of women with gestational diabetes in a multiethnic population. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:426–430. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.056267. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swan W, Kilmartin G, Liaw S. Assessment of readiness to prevent type 2 diabetes in a population of rural women with a history of gestational diabetes. Rural Remote Health. 2007;7:802. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms