Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;58(1):56-65.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.043. Epub 2013 May 21.

Treatment of acute visceral aortic pathology with fenestrated/branched endovascular repair in high-surgical-risk patients

Affiliations

Treatment of acute visceral aortic pathology with fenestrated/branched endovascular repair in high-surgical-risk patients

Salvatore T Scali et al. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The safety and feasibility of fenestrated/branched endovascular repair of acute visceral aortic disease in high-risk patients is unknown. The purpose of this report is to describe our experience with surgeon-modified endovascular aneurysm repair (sm-EVAR) for the urgent or emergent treatment of pathology involving the branched segment of the aorta in patients deemed to have prohibitively high medical and/or anatomic risk for open repair.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on all patients treated with sm-EVAR for acute indications. Planning was based on three-dimensional computed tomographic angiogram reconstructions and graft configurations included various combinations of branch, fenestration, or scallop modifications.

Results: Sixteen patients (mean age [± standard deviation], 68 ± 10 years; 88% male) deemed high risk for open repair underwent urgent or emergent repair using sm-EVAR. Indications included degenerative suprarenal or thoracoabdominal aneurysm (six), presumed or known mycotic aneurysm (four), anastomotic pseudoaneurysm (three), false lumen rupture of type B dissection (two), and penetrating aortic ulceration (one). Nine (56%) had previous aortic surgery and all patients were either American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV (n = 9) or IV-E (n = 7). A total of 40 visceral vessels (celiac, 10; superior mesenteric artery, 10; right renal artery, 10; left renal artery, 10) were revascularized with a combination of fenestrations (33), directional graft branches (six), and graft scallops (one). Technical success was 94% (n = 15/16), with one open conversion. Median contrast use was 126 mL (range, 41-245) and fluoroscopy time was 70 minutes (range, 18-200). Endoleaks were identified intraoperatively in four patients (type II, n = 3; type IV, n = 1), but none have required remediation. Mean length of stay was 12 ± 15 days (median, 5.5; range, 3-59). Single complications occurred in five (31%) patients as follows: brachial sheath hematoma (one), stroke (one), ileus (one), respiratory failure (one), and renal failure (one). An additional patient experienced multiple complications including spinal cord ischemia (one) and multiorgan failure resulting in death (n = 1; in-hospital mortality, 6.3%). The majority of patients were discharged to home (63%; n = 10) or short-term rehabilitation units (25%; n = 4), while one patient required admission to a long-term acute care setting. There were no reinterventions at a median follow-up of 6.2 (range, 1-16.1) months. Postoperative computed tomographic angiogram was available for all patients and demonstrated 100% branch vessel patency, with one type III endoleak pending intervention. There were two late deaths at 1.4 and 13.4 months due to nonaortic-related pathology.

Conclusions: Urgent or emergent treatment of acute pathology involving the visceral aortic segment with fenestrated/branched endograft repair is feasible and safe in selected high-risk patients; however, the durability of these repairs is yet to be determined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
This image demonstrates a graft used for repair of a suprarenal aneurysm. The graft was modified with two fenestrations (white arrows) for the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries and 2 straight graft branches (black arrows) for the renal arteries. Note the fenestration configuration with a PTFE grommet (Atrium Advanta SST graft) sewn together with a radiographic marker around the perimeter of the fenestration using a Gore suture. The straight graft branches are ~3mm long branches created from a 7mm Gore Viabahn stentgraft and sewn in place with a Gore suture incorporating the base of the branch along with a radiographic marker. Also note the temporary diameter-reducing sutures located at each stent ring, which allows flow through and around the graft during branch vessel catheterization.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The left image demonstrates a Gore TAG sheath with multiple smaller sheaths placed through the hub of the device for revascularization of 4 branch vessels. The image on the right demonstrates an endograft within an Extent IV TAAA with 4 target vessels catheterized.
Figure 3
Figure 3
This panel of images demonstrates pre-operative (top panels) and post-operative images of a patient with a ruptured pseudoaneurysm adjacent to the visceral vessels 4 weeks after an open Extent IV TAAA repair at an outside institution. Panels A, B and C demonstrate images of the preoperative CT demonstrating a large pseudoaneurysm. Panel D is a 3D reconstruction demonsrating the same, with the white arrows in Panels C and D demonstrating the opacified blush within the pseudoaneurysm. The lower panels are corresponding post-operative images at 15 months after repair, which demonstrate complete resolution of the pseudoaneurysm and healing around the stentgraft.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Survival after Surgeon-modified Fenestrated Endograft Repair of Acute Visceral Aortic Emergencies
This graph demonstrates 12 months survival after smEVAR, which was 88%. One patient died during hospitalization after multiple complications following repair, and 2 patients died of non-aneurysm related conditions at 1.4 and 13.4 months after repair.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Resch TA, Sonesson B, Dias N, Malina M. Chimney grafts: Is there a need and will they work? Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2011;23:149–153. - PubMed
    1. Pecoraro F, Pfammatter T, Mayer D, Frauenfelder T, Papadimitriou D, Hechelhammer L, Veith FJ, Lachat M, Rancic Z. Multiple periscope and chimney grafts to treat ruptured thoracoabdominal and pararenal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2011;18:642–649. - PubMed
    1. Cambria RP, Davison JK, Zannetti S, L’Italien G, Atamian S. Thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: Perspectives over a decade with the clamp-and-sew technique. Ann Surg. 1997;226:294–303. discussion 303-295. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Svensson LG, Crawford ES, Hess KR, Coselli JS, Safi HJ. Experience with 1509 patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic operations. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:357–368. discussion 368–370. - PubMed
    1. Coselli JS. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: Experience with 372 patients. J Card Surg. 1994;9:638–647. - PubMed

MeSH terms