Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Sep;36(1):14-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 22.

The Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE): method and design considerations

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE): method and design considerations

Edwin D Boudreaux et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Due to the concentration of individuals at-risk for suicide, an emergency department visit represents an opportune time for suicide risk screening and intervention.

Purpose: The Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE) uses a quasi-experimental, interrupted time series design to evaluate whether (1) a practical approach to universally screening ED patients for suicide risk leads to improved detection of suicide risk and (2) a multi-component intervention delivered during and after the ED visit improves suicide-related outcomes.

Methods: This paper summarizes the ED-SAFE's study design and methods within the context of considerations relevant to effectiveness research in suicide prevention and pertinent human participants concerns. 1440 suicidal individuals, from 8 general ED's nationally will be enrolled during three sequential phases of data collection (480 individuals/phase): (1) Treatment as Usual; (2) Universal Screening; and (3) Intervention. Data from the three phases will inform two separate evaluations: Screening Outcome (Phases 1 and 2) and Intervention (Phases 2 and 3). Individuals will be followed for 12 months. The primary study outcome is a composite reflecting completed suicide, attempted suicide, aborted or interrupted attempts, and implementation of rescue procedures during an outcome assessment.

Conclusions: While 'classic' randomized control trials (RCT) are typically selected over quasi-experimental designs, ethical and methodological issues may make an RCT a poor fit for complex interventions in an applied setting, such as the ED. ED-SAFE represents an innovative approach to examining the complex public health issue of suicide prevention through a multi-phase, quasi-experimental design embedded in 'real world' clinical settings.

Keywords: Emergency department; Mental health; Research methods; Suicide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Figure One: ED-SAFE Study Design
Fig 2
Fig 2
Figure Two: Screeners
Fig 3
Fig 3
Figure Three: Personal Safety Plan Template
Fig 3
Fig 3
Figure Three: Personal Safety Plan Template

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) 2012 www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars.
    1. D'Onofrio G, Jauch E, Jagoda A, et al. NIH Roundtable on Opportunities to Advance Research on Neurologic and Psychiatric Emergencies. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(5):551–564. - PubMed
    1. Ting SA, Sullivan AF, Boudreaux ED, Miller I, Camargo CA., Jr Trends in US emergency department visits for attempted suicide and self-inflicted injury, 1993–2008. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. May 2; - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beautrais AL. Further suicidal behavior among medically serious suicide attempters. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004;34(1):1–11. - PubMed
    1. Gairin I, House A, Owens D. Attendance at the accident and emergency department in the year before suicide: retrospective study. Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Jul;183:28–33. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources