Esophageal motility and impedance characteristics in patients with Barrett's esophagus before and after radiofrequency ablation
- PMID: 23708277
- DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32836283dc
Esophageal motility and impedance characteristics in patients with Barrett's esophagus before and after radiofrequency ablation
Abstract
Introduction: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a valuable treatment option in Barrett's esophagus resulting in eradication of dysplasia and conversion of all Barrett's epithelium into normal squamous epithelium. In Barrett's esophagus, esophageal impedance monitoring is hampered by low baseline impedance values. Whether these low baselines are caused by an intrinsically low impedance of cylindrical epithelium or by the excessive reflux itself is hitherto unknown. Data on esophageal motility after RFA are scarce. Our aim was to examine the effect of RFA on esophageal motility and esophageal baseline impedance in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
Methods: In 10 patients, conventional esophageal manometry and 24-h pH-impedance measurements were performed before and after RFA. The number and type of reflux episodes were assessed and baseline impedance values were measured in all recording segments. In another five patients, high-resolution manometry was performed before and after RFA.
Results: Complete regression of all Barrett's epithelium was achieved in all 15 patients after 3 ± 1 RFA sessions. Overall, no significant motility changes were found after RFA. Patients had excessive acid exposure times before and after RFA [25 (17-42) and 16 (9-24)%, respectively]. Baseline esophageal impedance values were low, with the lowest values in the distal recording segments. RFA increased baseline impedance in all recording segments in the upright position; in the supine position, the effect just failed to reach statistically significant levels.
Conclusion: RFA did not alter esophageal motility significantly. Low esophageal baseline impedance levels in patients with Barrett's esophagus reflect, at least in part, intrinsic impedance properties of cylindrical epithelium, as baselines increased after conversion into neosquamous epithelium.
Similar articles
-
Stepwise radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus preserves esophageal inner diameter, compliance, and motility.Endoscopy. 2009 Jan;41(1):2-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103451. Epub 2009 Jan 21. Endoscopy. 2009. PMID: 19160152
-
Pseudo-buried Barrett's post radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus, with or without prior endoscopic resection.Endoscopy. 2014 Feb;46(2):105-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358883. Epub 2013 Nov 27. Endoscopy. 2014. PMID: 24285123 Clinical Trial.
-
Endoscopic therapy using radiofrequency ablation for esophageal dysplasia and carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Jan;20(1):55-74, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2009.07.007. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010. PMID: 19951794 Review.
-
Predictive factors for initial treatment response after circumferential radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia: a prospective multicenter study.Endoscopy. 2013 Jul;45(7):516-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326423. Epub 2013 Apr 11. Endoscopy. 2013. PMID: 23580412 Clinical Trial.
-
Barrett's esophagus: the American perspective.Dig Dis. 2013;31(1):10-6. doi: 10.1159/000347099. Epub 2013 Jun 17. Dig Dis. 2013. PMID: 23797117 Review.
Cited by
-
Utility and Cost-Effectiveness of a Nonendoscopic Approach to Barrett's Esophagus Surveillance After Endoscopic Therapy.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):e51-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Feb 10. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 33581357 Free PMC article.
-
Ablative therapy for esophageal dysplasia and early malignancy: focus on RFA.Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:642063. doi: 10.1155/2014/642063. Epub 2014 Jul 21. Biomed Res Int. 2014. PMID: 25140320 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Leaky Gullet or Leaky Gut?Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1072-1073. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.136. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28725075
-
Esophageal Impedance Monitoring: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls.Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;111(9):1245-56. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.256. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27325223 Review.
-
Mucosal impedance as a diagnostic tool for gastroesophageal reflux disease: an update for clinicians.Dis Esophagus. 2024 Aug 29;37(9):doae037. doi: 10.1093/dote/doae037. Dis Esophagus. 2024. PMID: 38670809 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical