Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb;32(1):173-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1102-7. Epub 2013 May 26.

Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction

Eric Chung et al. World J Urol. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to assess the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rate between men aged under and over 75 years who underwent inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation.

Methods and materials: A retrospective review of clinical database and follow-up independent telephone survey was undertaken in all men who underwent first-time IPP implantation between January 2006 and November 2010. Patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and patient satisfaction rate using Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) scores were recorded.

Results: A total of 216 first-time IPP were implanted. Of these, 30 patients were aged ≥75 years. In men aged ≥75 years, 3 patients had IPP revision surgery for mechanical malfunction (average 18.6 months; 12-24 months). While the 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of mechanical survival showed better outcome in men aged ≥75 years than men aged <75 years (95 vs. 92%; p = 0.38), there was no difference in the IPP mechanical survival between the 2 groups at 3 years follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in the ease of IPP use, and EDITS scores among the two groups. The majority of men were satisfied and would recommend the IPP surgery to other men.

Conclusions: Men aged ≥75 years reported satisfactory outcome with IPP surgery with no statistical significant difference identified across device survival and satisfaction rates compared to men aged <75 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Eur Urol. 2004 May;45(5):628-33 - PubMed
    1. J Sex Med. 2007 Jul;4(4 Pt 1):1074-9 - PubMed
    1. J Sex Med. 2007 Sep;4(5):1247-53 - PubMed
    1. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:240963 - PubMed
    1. J Sex Med. 2010 Jan;7(1 Pt 2):501-23 - PubMed

Publication types