A survey of expert follow-up practices after successful endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma
- PMID: 23711553
- PMCID: PMC3961573
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.196
A survey of expert follow-up practices after successful endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma
Abstract
Background: Despite the increasing number of patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal cancer (IMC), there are few data to guide clinical decision making and research initiatives in the area of posttreatment follow-up.
Objectives: We aimed to define expert practice patterns regarding follow-up after endoscopic treatment of BE with HGD and IMC.
Design: Electronic survey.
Subjects: Forty-eight endoscopists in the United States with expertise in BE endotherapy based on high-impact publications and national reputation.
Intervention: A 21-item Web-based survey inquiring about post-BE endotherapy follow-up practices.
Results: Of 48 expert endoscopists, 42 completed the survey. After successful treatment of BE with HGD or IMC, all experts perform surveillance upper endoscopy, most commonly at 3-month intervals in the first posttreatment year, every 6 months during the second year, and annually thereafter. None of the experts perform surveillance EUS after treatment of HGD, and only 19% perform EUS after treatment of IMC. After cancer eradication, only 36% of experts refer patients for CT, and 24% refer patients for positron emission tomography. Thirty-eight percent of experts refer patients for a surgical opinion when IMC extends into the muscularis mucosa; 100% refer when IMC extends into submucosa.
Limitations: Not a consensus document; only U.S. experts included.
Conclusions: This study reports the follow-up practices of expert endoscopists after successful endotherapy for BE with HGD and IMC. Additional research is necessary to establish optimal surveillance intervals, the role of follow-up EUS, CT, and positron emission tomography, as well as the surgical implications of low-risk IMC extending into the muscularis mucosa.
Keywords: BE; Barrett's esophagus; HGD; IMC; PET; high-grade dysplasia; intramucosal cancer; positron emission tomography.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
The essence of management of Barrett's esophagus.Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov;78(5):702-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.006. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013. PMID: 24120334 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Pouw RE, Seewald S, Gondrie JJ, et al. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for eradication of Barrett's oesophagus with early neoplasia in a cohort of 169 patients. Gut. 2010;59:1169–77. - PubMed
-
- Pech O, Behrens A, May A, et al. Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus. Gut. 2008;57:1200–6. - PubMed
-
- Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2277–88. - PubMed
-
- Ganz RA, Overholt BF, Sharma VK, et al. Circumferential ablation of Barrett's esophagus that contains high-grade dysplasia: a U.S. multicenter registry. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:35–40. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
