Effects of asymmetric superior laryngeal nerve stimulation on glottic posture, acoustics, vibration
- PMID: 23712542
- PMCID: PMC3841237
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.24209
Effects of asymmetric superior laryngeal nerve stimulation on glottic posture, acoustics, vibration
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis: Evaluate the effects of asymmetric superior laryngeal nerve stimulation on the vibratory phase, laryngeal posture, and acoustics.
Study design: Basic science study using an in vivo canine model.
Methods: The superior laryngeal nerves were symmetrically and asymmetrically stimulated over eight activation levels to mimic laryngeal asymmetries representing various levels of superior laryngeal nerve paresis and paralysis conditions. Glottal posture change, vocal fold speed, and vibration of these 64 distinct laryngeal-activation conditions were evaluated by high speed video and concurrent acoustic and aerodynamic recordings. Assessments were made at phonation onset.
Results: Vibratory phase was symmetric in all symmetric activation conditions, but consistent phase asymmetry toward the vocal fold with higher superior laryngeal-nerve activation was observed. Superior laryngeal nerve paresis and paralysis conditions had reduced vocal fold strain and fundamental frequency. Superior laryngeal nerve activation increased vocal fold closure speed, but this effect was more pronounced for the ipsilateral vocal fold. Increasing asymmetry led to aperiodic and chaotic vibration.
Conclusions: This study directly links vocal-fold tension asymmetry with vibratory phase asymmetry, in particular the side with greater tension leads in the opening phase. The clinical observations of vocal fold lag, reduced vocal range, and aperiodic voice in superior laryngeal paresis and paralysis is also supported.
Keywords: Superior laryngeal nerve; acoustics; high speed video; laryngeal asymmetry; vibration; voice production.
Copyright © 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures







References
-
- Herzel H, Berry D, Titze I, Steinecke I. Nonlinear dynamics of the voice: Signal analysis and biomechanical modeling. Chaos. 1995;5(1):30–34. - PubMed
-
- Eysholdt U, Rosanowski F, Hoppe U. Vocal fold vibration irregularities caused by different types of laryngeal asymmetry. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;260(8):412–7. - PubMed
-
- Koufman JA, Postma GN, Cummins MM, Blalock PD. Vocal fold paresis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Apr;122(4):537–41. - PubMed
-
- Simpson CB, Cheung EJ, Jackson CJ. Vocal fold paresis: clinical and electrophysiologic features in a tertiary laryngology practice. J Voice. 2009;23(3):396–8. - PubMed
-
- Rubin AD, Praneetvatakul V, Heman-Ackah Y, Moyer CA, Mandel S, Sataloff RT. Repetitive phonatory tasks for identifying vocal fold paresis. J Voice. 2005;19(4):679–86. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources