Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 1;133(11):2533-41.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.28286. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

Calcium inhibits promotion by hot dog of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced mucin-depleted foci in rat colon

Affiliations

Calcium inhibits promotion by hot dog of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced mucin-depleted foci in rat colon

Raphaelle L Santarelli et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

Epidemiology suggests that processed meat is associated with colorectal cancer risk, but few experimental studies support this association. We have shown that a model of cured meat made in a pilot workshop promotes preneoplastic lesions, mucin-depleted foci (MDF) in the colon of rats. This study had two aims: to check if real store-bought processed meats also promote MDF, and to test if calcium carbonate, which suppresses heme-induced promotion, can suppress promotion by processed meat. A 14-day study was done to test the effect of nine purchased cured meats on fecal and urinary biomarkers associated with heme-induced carcinogenesis promotion. Fecal water from rats given hot dog or fermented raw dry sausage was particularly cytotoxic. These two cured meats were thus given to rats pretreated with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine, to evaluate their effect on colorectal carcinogenesis. After a 100-days feeding period, fecal apparent total N-nitroso compounds (ATNC) were assayed and colons were scored for MDF. Hot dog diet increased fecal ATNC and the number of MDF per colon compared with the no-meat control diet (3.0 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.05). In a third study, addition of calcium carbonate (150 µmol/g) to the hot dog diet decreased the number of MDF/colon and fecal ATNC compared with the hot dog diet without calcium carbonate (1.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.4, respectively, p < 0.05). This is the first experimental evidence that a widely consumed processed meat promotes colon carcinogenesis in rats. It also shows that dietary prevention of this detrimental effect is possible.

Keywords: calcium; colorectal cancer; preneoplastic lesions; prevention; processed meat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial disclosure, conflict of interest

This work was supported by French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), the French National Research Agency [PNRA, HemeCancer Project, grant number ANR-05-PNRA-5.E14] and a National Institutes of Health [grant number, RO1-CA-143460].

R.L. Santarelli, as a PhD student, and J.L. Vendeuvre were paid by IFIP (Institut Français du Porc). This article is done “in memoriam” of J.L. Vendeuvre. The other authors disclosed no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Effect of cured meat (hot dog, saucisson), and calcium carbonate (Ca), on mucin-depleted foci (MDF) in rat colon 99 d after the injection of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine, in two independent studies: Promotion study on the left, Protection study on the right. (B) Nitroso-compounds (ATNC) in feces of rats. Values are means and standard error of the mean (10 rats per group). Diets contained 40% and 50% processed meat (dry matter), full composition shown in Table 1. *: significantly different from control diet (left panel) or from hot dog diet (right panel)

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917. - PubMed
    1. Cummings JH, Bingham SA. Diet and the prevention of cancer. Bmj. 1998;317:1636–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Cancer Research Fund W, American Institute for Cancer Research A. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. WCRF and AICR; Washington DC: 2007. pp. 1–537.
    1. Sandhu MS, White IR, Mcpherson K. Systematic review of the prospective cohort studies on meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analytical approach. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2001;10:439–46. - PubMed
    1. Norat T, Lukanova A, Ferrari P, Riboli E. Meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. International Journal of Cancer. 2002;98:241–56. - PubMed

Publication types