Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 May 28:14:154.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-154.

Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial

Elizabeth Lutge  1 , Simon Lewin, Jimmy Volmink, Irwin Friedman, Carl Lombard
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial

Elizabeth Lutge et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Poverty undermines adherence to tuberculosis treatment. Economic support may both encourage and enable patients to complete treatment. In South Africa, which carries a high burden of tuberculosis, such support may improve the currently poor outcomes of patients on tuberculosis treatment. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and effectiveness of delivering economic support to patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in a high-burden province of South Africa.

Methods: This was a pragmatic, unblinded, two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial, where 20 public sector clinics acted as clusters. Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in intervention clinics (n = 2,107) were offered a monthly voucher of ZAR120.00 (approximately US$15) until the completion of their treatment. Vouchers were redeemed at local shops for foodstuffs. Patients in control clinics (n = 1,984) received usual tuberculosis care.

Results: Intention to treat analysis showed a small but non-significant improvement in treatment success rates in intervention clinics (intervention 76.2%; control 70.7%; risk difference 5.6% (95% confidence interval: -1.2%, 12.3%), P = 0.107). Low fidelity to the intervention meant that 36.2% of eligible patients did not receive a voucher at all, 32.3% received a voucher for between one and three months and 31.5% received a voucher for four to eight months of treatment. There was a strong dose-response relationship between frequency of receipt of the voucher and treatment success (P <0.001).

Conclusions: Our pragmatic trial has shown that, in the real world setting of public sector clinics in South Africa, economic support to patients with tuberculosis does not significantly improve outcomes on treatment. However, the low fidelity to the delivery of our voucher meant that a third of eligible patients did not receive it. Among patients in intervention clinics who received the voucher at least once, treatment success rates were significantly improved. Further operational research is needed to explore how best to ensure the consistent and appropriate delivery of such support to those eligible to receive it.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of increasing frequency of vouchers on treatment success rate.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Farmer P. Infections and Inequalities: The modern Plagues. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 2001. The consumption of the poor.
    1. Dubos R, Dubos J. The White Plague: Tuberculosis, Man and Society. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1996. xv.
    1. Ploubidis GB, Palmer MJ, Blackmore C, Lim TA, Manissero D, Sandgren A, Semenza JC. Social determinants of tuberculosis in Europe: a prospective ecological study. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:925–930. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00184011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates I, Fenton C, Gruber J, Lalloo D, Lara AM, Squire SB, Theobald S, Thomson R, Tolhurst R. Vulnerability to malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS infection and disease. Part 1: determinants operating at individual and household level. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4(5):267–277. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01002-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coovadia H, Jewkes R, Barron P, Sanders D, McIntyre D. The health and health system of South Africa: historical roots of current public health challenges. Lancet. 2009;374(9692):817–834. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60951-X. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources