Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of submucous cleft palate severity and guide for surgical intervention
- PMID: 23714922
- DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828f2651
Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of submucous cleft palate severity and guide for surgical intervention
Abstract
Background: Diagnosis of submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is frequently delayed, adversely affecting speech outcomes. Previous studies show that MRI reliably identifies structural abnormalities in velopharyngeal musculature. This information has potential to assist with diagnosis and treatment decisions.
Aims: The objectives of this study were to (1) develop a clinician-friendly MRI grading scale of SMCP anatomy, (2) identify correlations between radiographic cleft severity and clinical severity using Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scores (PWSS), and (3) determine if MRI is a predictor of surgical efficacy in improving PWSS.
Design: Thirty patients presenting to our Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Clinic for evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) and suspected SMCP were reviewed. VPI severity was clinically graded using PWSS. All patients underwent MRI to grade palatal abnormalities, using a novel MRI grading scale. PWSS and cleft severity on MRI were compared. A subgroup of patients (n = 19) underwent palatoplasty. Preoperative and postoperative PWSS were compared. Degree of PWSS improvement was then correlated with the preoperative MRI grade.
Results: Twenty-nine out of 30 MRIs demonstrated abnormal palate anatomy. Of the 30 patients evaluated, 5 clinically improved with speech therapy alone. In this subgroup, MRI severity did not correlate with PWSS (P = 0.06-0.6). Nineteen patients underwent palatoplasty. Of these, 14 demonstrated improved postoperative PWSS. There were no significant correlations between severity of cleft on imaging and preoperative PWSS or score improvement (P = 0.056-0.65).
Conclusion: While MRI accurately identifies structural abnormalities of the soft palate, these abnormalities do not reliably correspond to clinical severity. Clinical examination including speech scores and dynamic speech testing, rather than static MRI, should guide treatment decisions and surgical indications.
Similar articles
-
Improving speech outcomes after failed palate repair: evaluating the safety and efficacy of conversion Furlow palatoplasty.J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Mar;25(2):343-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000375. J Craniofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24621692
-
Speech Outcomes After Clinically Indicated Posterior Pharyngeal Flap Takedown.Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;77(4):420-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000632. Ann Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 26418795
-
Results with Furlow palatoplasty in management of velopharyngeal insufficiency.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jul;108(1):17-25; discussion 26-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200107000-00004. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001. PMID: 11420500
-
Current Controversies in Diagnosis and Management of Cleft Palate and Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:196240. doi: 10.1155/2015/196240. Epub 2015 Jul 26. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26273595 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Speech and language characteristics in individuals with nonsyndromic submucous cleft palate-A systematic review.Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Nov;44(6):818-831. doi: 10.1111/cch.12613. Epub 2018 Aug 22. Child Care Health Dev. 2018. PMID: 30136310
Cited by
-
What Technique Results in the Lowest Rate of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Submucous Cleft Palate? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 May;32(2):226-234. doi: 10.1177/22925503221110066. Epub 2022 Jul 6. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024. PMID: 38681241 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical