Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 28;19(20):3077-82.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i20.3077.

Robotic cholecystectomy with new port sites

Affiliations

Robotic cholecystectomy with new port sites

Ji Hun Kim et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To introduce robotic cholecystectomy (RC) using new port sites on the low abdominal area.

Methods: From June 2010 to June 2011, a total of 178 RCs were performed at Ajou University Medical Center. We prospectively collected the set-up time (working time and docking time) and console time in all robotic procedures.

Results: Eighty-three patients were male and 95 female; the age ranged from 18 to 72 years of age (mean 54.6 ± 15.0 years). All robotic procedures were successfully completed. The mean operation time was 52.4 ± 17.1 min. The set-up time and console time were 11.9 ± 5.4 min (5-43 min) and 15.1 ± 8.0 min (4-50 min), respectively. The conversion rate to laparoscopic or open procedures was zero. The complication rate was 0.6% (n = 1, bleeding). There was no bile duct injury or mortality. The mean hospital stay was 1.4 ± 1.1 d. There was a significant correlation between the console time and white blood cell count (r = 0.033, P = 0.015). In addition, the higher the white blood cell count (more than 10000), the longer the console time.

Conclusion: Robotic cholecystectomy using new port sites on the low abdominal area can be safely and efficiently performed, with sufficient patient satisfaction.

Keywords: Abdominal area; Gallbladder disease; Operation time; Port sites; Robotic cholecystectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Port sites of robotic cholecystectomy. A 12-mm trocar was inserted through a vertical incision below the umbilicus using an open method. The 8-mm ports were placed 7 to 10 cm distant from the endoscope.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between console time and white blood cell count. There was a significant correlation between console time and white blood cell count (r = 0.182, P = 0.015).

References

    1. Brasesco OE, Rosin D, Rosenthal RJ. Laparoscopic surgery of the liver and biliary tract. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002;12:91–100. - PubMed
    1. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004;239:14–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Voitk AJ, Tsao SG, Ignatius S. The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;182:250–253. - PubMed
    1. Dakin GF, Gagner M. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:574–579. - PubMed
    1. Jourdan IC, Dutson E, Garcia A, Vleugels T, Leroy J, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy. Br J Surg. 2004;91:879–885. - PubMed

MeSH terms