Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Novel insights into the bovine polled phenotype and horn ontogenesis in Bovidae

Aurélie Allais-Bonnet et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Despite massive research efforts, the molecular etiology of bovine polledness and the developmental pathways involved in horn ontogenesis are still poorly understood. In a recent article, we provided evidence for the existence of at least two different alleles at the Polled locus and identified candidate mutations for each of them. None of these mutations was located in known coding or regulatory regions, thus adding to the complexity of understanding the molecular basis of polledness. We confirm previous results here and exhaustively identify the causative mutation for the Celtic allele (PC) and four candidate mutations for the Friesian allele (PF). We describe a previously unreported eyelash-and-eyelid phenotype associated with regular polledness, and present unique histological and gene expression data on bovine horn bud differentiation in fetuses affected by three different horn defect syndromes, as well as in wild-type controls. We propose the ectopic expression of a lincRNA in PC/p horn buds as a probable cause of horn bud agenesis. In addition, we provide evidence for an involvement of OLIG2, FOXL2 and RXFP2 in horn bud differentiation, and draw a first link between bovine, ovine and caprine Polled loci. Our results represent a first and important step in understanding the genetic pathways and key process involved in horn bud differentiation in Bovidae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The following co-authors are employed by commercial companies: DS and IR (Tierzuchtforschung e.V. München), MNR (LABOGENA), P. Reversé and MF (Gènes Diffusion), OC and JLM (Evolution), PS (UCATRC), P. Roy (UALC) and GEH (Farmers Association of Iceland). The following commercial companies kindly provided a significant amount of samples and phenotypic information: COOP’EVOLIA, Coopex Montbéliarde, Evolution, Gènes Diffusion, GENESIA, Göpel Genetik GmbH, LABOGENA, MIDATEST, Tierzuchtforschung e.V. München, UALC, UCATRC, the Farmers Association of Iceland and the Bonsmara Cattle Breeders’ Society. However no funding was provided by these companies or cattle breeders’ associations. In addition, neither these companies nor cattle breeders’ associations were involved in the study design, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the paper, or decision to submit for publication. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Frequency of the most frequent haplotypes across 17 Western European breeds for sliding windows of 79 markers at the beginning of BTA01.
Only windows located in the first three megabases of BTA01, according to the UMD3.1 bovine genome assembly, are shown. Window 509, for which the maximal frequency is found (68.48%), corresponds to the segment located between positions 1,693,164 and 2,018,403.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Accurate mapping of the Polled locus and identification of candidate causative mutations.
(A) Localization on BTA01 of the intervals (gray boxes) containing the Polled mutations associated with different haplotypes based on Illumina BovineSNP50 beadchip genotyping data. Upper and lower double arrows indicate the region in which the most informative recombination occurred at the left and right border of the interval, respectively. (B) Gene content of the Polled intervals. (C) Localization of the candidate mutations for the Celtic (blue) and Friesian (green) Polled alleles, and details of the coding and non-coding genes in their close vicinity. LincRNA: Long intergenic non-coding RNA. LincRNA#1 and 2 correspond, respectively, to EST sequences n° AW356369, AW357421, BF654718, BM105296, BM254775, BM254845 and BC122836, DT831326, DT837875, DY200702, DY169884, EH130782, EH138227, EV606908, EV693397 in Genbank. Positions on BTA01 are based on the UMD3.1 bovine genome assembly. Polymorphism g.1855898G>A is located within an intron of LincRNA#2. Red bars indicate the two sequence variations between the original and the duplicated 80-kb segments.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Details of the eyelash and eyelid phenotypes associated with polledness.
Eyes of a wild-type bull (A), three PC/p Charolais bulls (B, D and E), and a PF/p Holstein cow (C). Note the typical eyelid hypertrichosis and accessory rows of lashes in polled animals, with additional hair showing pronounced variability in size and orientation and darker coloration in pigmented animals (C). Arrows show additional hair growing on the inner part of the eyelid (i.e., distichiasis).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Histological analyses of horn buds and forehead skin from wild-type fetuses and fetuses affected by different horn-defect syndromes.
(A), (D), (G), (J) and (L) Histological sections of horn buds of a wt, two TWIST1+/−, a PC/p and a PMS fetus, respectively. (B) and (C), (E) and (F), and (H) and (I) Magnifications (X10 and X3, respectively) of (A), (D) and (G). (K) and (M) Magnifications (X10) of (J) and (L). (N) Histological section of the forehead skin of a wt fetus. (O) Magnification (X10) of (N). Scale bars in (A), (D), (G), (J), (L) and (N) represent 1 mm, whereas scale bars in (B), (C), (E), (F), (H), (I), (K), (M) and (O) represent 100 µm.
Figure 5
Figure 5. RT-qPCR gene expression analyses in tissues from wild-type and PC/p 90 dpc fetuses.
HB: horn buds+frontal bone, FS: frontal skin+frontal bone. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, and a: p = 0.052 (Fischer’s test).
Figure 6
Figure 6. RT-qPCR gene expression analyses in tissues from wild-type, PC/p, TWIST1+/− and PMS 90 dpc fetuses.
HB: horn buds+frontal bone, FS: frontal skin+frontal bone. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 (Fischer’s test). P-values were not calculated for expression levels in tissues from TWIST1+/− and PMS fetuses due to the small number of individuals investigated.

References

    1. Misch LJ, Duffield TF, Millman ST, Lissemore KD (2007) An investigation into the practices of dairy producers and veterinarians in dehorning dairy calves in Ontario. Can Vet J 48: 1249–1254. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prayaga KC (2007) Genetic options to replace dehorning in beef cattle-a review. Aust J Agric Res 58: 1–8.
    1. Graf B, Senn M (1999) Behavioural and physiological responses of calves to dehorning by heat cauterization with or without local anaesthesia. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62: 153–171.
    1. Roman A (2004) L’élevage bovin en Egypte antique. Bull Soc Fr Hist Méd Sci Vét 3: 35–45.
    1. Capitan A (2010) Détection et caractérisation de loci responsables d’anomalies de cornage en race Charolais français [PhD thesis]. Paris: Institut des Sciences et Industries du Vivant et de l’Environnement (Agro Paris Tech).

Publication types

Substances