Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;69(Pt 3):249-59.
doi: 10.1107/S2052519213010014. Epub 2013 May 17.

Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement

Affiliations

Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement

Simon Parsons et al. Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Several methods for absolute structure refinement were tested using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data collected using Cu Kα radiation for 23 crystals with no element heavier than oxygen: conventional refinement using an inversion twin model, estimation using intensity quotients in SHELXL2012, estimation using Bayesian methods in PLATON, estimation using restraints consisting of numerical intensity differences in CRYSTALS and estimation using differences and quotients in TOPAS-Academic where both quantities were coded in terms of other structural parameters and implemented as restraints. The conventional refinement approach yielded accurate values of the Flack parameter, but with standard uncertainties ranging from 0.15 to 0.77. The other methods also yielded accurate values of the Flack parameter, but with much higher precision. Absolute structure was established in all cases, even for a hydrocarbon. The procedures in which restraints are coded explicitly in terms of other structural parameters enable the Flack parameter to correlate with these other parameters, so that it is determined along with those parameters during refinement.

Keywords: absolute structure refinement; intensity quotients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plot of Q obs(h) against Q single(h) [as defined in equations (5) and (6)] for (a) l-alanine and (b) cholestane. (c) as (b), but only the top 200 most influential points are shown; the axes are chosen to be the same as (b).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Outlier detection. Normal probability plot calculated using observed quotient restraint deviates formula image for TWA16a. The extreme point at the bottom left was omitted as an outlier. This plot was calculated prior to rescaling of weights.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Leverage analysis for l-alanineB. (a) Leverages of |F obs(h)|2 and difference data, D obs(h). (b) Relative influences of |F obs(h)|2 and D obs(h) on the precision of the Flack parameter (as expressed by the quantity T). In each case |F obs(h)|2 data are shown in orange and D obs(h) data in green.

References

    1. Abrahams, S. C. & Keve, E. T. (1971). Acta Cryst. A27, 157–165.
    1. Bernardinelli, G. & Flack, H. D. (1985). Acta Cryst. A41, 500–511.
    1. Betteridge, P. W., Carruthers, J. R., Cooper, R. I., Prout, K. & Watkin, D. J. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 1487.
    1. Beurskens, P. T., Beurskens, G., Bosman, W. P., de Gelder, R., Garcia-Granda, S., Gould, R. O., Israel, R. & Smits, J. M. M. (1996). DIRDIF96. University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
    1. Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38. - PubMed