Different conceptions of mental illness: consequences for the association with patients
- PMID: 23720646
- PMCID: PMC3654202
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00269
Different conceptions of mental illness: consequences for the association with patients
Abstract
Whenever partial knowledge is considered absolute and turned into ideological and dogmatic conceptions, the risk increases that the conditions for the people involved might become dangerous. This will be illustrated by casuistic examples of consequences of one-sided psychiatric conceptions such as social, biological, and psychological ideas about the treatment and care of the mentally ill. Present perspectives of an integrative model, i.e., an advanced bio-psycho-social conception about evidence-based characteristics on the social, psychological, and molecular-genetic level, require that all of these dimensions should be considered in order to personalize and thereby improve the care and treatment of the mentally ill.
Keywords: absolutization of partial conceptions; bio-psycho-social model; conceptions of mental illness; instrumentalization of the ill; normative content of human experience; preference diagnosis; social hygiene; social space of the family.
References
-
- Basaglia F. (1968). L’Istituzione Negata. Torino: Einaudi
-
- Biegler P. (2011). The Ethical Treatment of Depression. Autonomy Through Psychotherapy. Cambridge: MIT Press
-
- Bochnik H. J., Broszio E., Domke W., Pittrich W., Wilbrandt K. (1967). Aufgaben und organisation einer klinischen Auswertungsabteilung. Methods Inf. Med. 6, 51–64 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
