Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;17(8):1807-20.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0998-z. Epub 2013 May 31.

A systematic review on the outcome of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants suffering Robin sequence

Affiliations

A systematic review on the outcome of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants suffering Robin sequence

Emma C Paes et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) has been successfully applied in infants suffering Robin sequence (RS) with severe upper airway obstruction, but no comparative studies for the different types of MDO exist to date. The objective of the current study was to systematically review the published data considering this matter, providing a fundament for protocols and a more conscious treatment strategy for infants with RS in the near future.

Material and methods: For the period from January 1966 to January 2012, the Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Abstracts were screened based on predetermined selection criteria. Relevant full-text articles were retrieved. The articles were analyzed on the type of MDO used, preoperative workup, patient characteristics, postoperative outcome, and complications.

Results: The search yielded 109 articles. After checking abstracts and full texts on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies (four describing external MDO, five internal MDO, and three both types) were extracted for further analyses.

Conclusion: Internal MDO seems very feasible in infants suffering RS, minimizing side effects such as hypertrophic scarring, nerve damage, and extensive care needs, although the indications for usage are more limited compared to the external device. Corresponding protocols and long-term outcome studies are needed to make a better comparison and the use and indication of the different types of distraction even more distinct.

Clinical relevance: A base for a guideline to support the choice of a designated operative management for neonates with RS is provided, hereby obviating possible complications of the different types of MDO in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973 May;51(5):506-8 - PubMed
    1. J Craniofac Surg. 2004 Jul;15(4):623-30 - PubMed
    1. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Aug;75(8):985-91 - PubMed
    1. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 Jul;48(4):478-82 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Nov;37(11):1556-62 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources