Don't middle your MIDs: regression to the mean shrinks estimates of minimally important differences
- PMID: 23722635
- PMCID: PMC3961825
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0443-4
Don't middle your MIDs: regression to the mean shrinks estimates of minimally important differences
Abstract
Minimal important differences (MIDs) for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often estimated by selecting a clinical variable to serve as an anchor. Then, differences in the clinical anchor regarded as clinically meaningful or important can be used to estimate the corresponding value of the PRO. Although these MID values are sometimes estimated by regression techniques, we show that this is a biased procedure and should not be used; alternative methods are proposed.
References
-
- Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1989;10:407–415. - PubMed
-
- US Food and Drug Administration Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Guidance for industry. 2009 http://www.fda.gov/down loads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformat.... Accessed March 20, 2013. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Schwartz N, Sudman S. Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports. Springer; New York: 1994.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
