Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD008987.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008987.pub2.

Surgical interventions for treating radial head fractures in adults

Yu Gao  1 , Wei Zhang, Xin Duan, Jing Yang, Mohammed Al-Qwbani, Jingtong Lv, Zhou Xiang
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Surgical interventions for treating radial head fractures in adults

Yu Gao et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Radial head fractures are the most common type of elbow fracture and can severely affect the function of the elbow. There is uncertainty and controversy about when surgery is indicated as well as what type of surgical intervention is best.

Objectives: To assess the effects of surgical interventions for treating radial head fractures in adults. We aimed to compare surgical versus non-surgical treatment, and different methods of surgical intervention.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (May 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library; 2012 Issue 4), MEDLINE (1946 to May 2012), EMBASE (1980 to 2012 Week 19) and trial registers (November 2011). No language restrictions were applied.

Selection criteria: All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for treating radial head fractures.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Where appropriate, results were pooled.

Main results: We included three randomised controlled trials, involving a total of 251 participants. All three trials were at high risk of performance bias reflecting the fact that surgeons could not be blinded. One trial was at low risk of selection bias but was undermined by a high attrition bias, in part resulting from post-randomisation exclusions. There were incomplete details of methodology for the other two trials, which usually resulted in unclear risk of bias judgements.Two trials compared radial head replacement with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for treating Mason type III radial head fractures. The trial authors reported outcomes at a mean of 2.8 years and 15 months respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups in favour of radial head replacement in the Broberg and Morrey elbow scores (92.1 versus 72.4, mean difference (MD) 19.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.64 to 23.76; one trial, 45 participants), excellent or good Broberg and Morrey elbow scores (33/36 versus 16/31, risk ratio (RR) 1.88; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.77; two trials), and overall adverse events (6/36 versus 15/31, RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.77; two trials). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the reported individual adverse events.One trial compared biodegradable pins with standard metal screws in treating radial head fractures of AO-classification 21 B2. The two types of fixation devices yielded similar results, with no significant between-group differences in the Broberg and Morrey scores (93.3 versus 90.9, MD 2.40; 95% CI -0.10 to 4.90), excellent or good Broberg and Morrey elbow scores (72/74 versus 56/61, RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.15), and adverse events (13/82 versus 16/82, RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.58) at two-year follow-up.

Authors' conclusions: Only tentative conclusions can be drawn from the available evidence in this review. Compared with ORIF, there was some evidence that radial head replacement had better elbow function and fewer adverse events for Mason type III radial head fractures in the short term. However, the evidence is of low quality and it is unknown whether these results would apply in the longer term or more generally. Using biodegradable implants may be as good as metallic implants for fixation of some usually more stable fractures but more evidence is needed to confirm this. There is a need for good quality evidence for addressing the areas of uncertainty for the surgical treatment of radial head fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Radial head replacement versus ORIF, Outcome 1 Broberg and Morrey functional rating score (0 to 100: best outcome) at 2 years.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Radial head replacement versus ORIF, Outcome 2 Broberg and Morrey functional rating score ‐ excellent or good results.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Radial head replacement versus ORIF, Outcome 3 Overall adverse events.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Radial head replacement versus ORIF, Outcome 4 Individual adverse events.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Biodegradable pins versus standard metal screws, Outcome 1 Broberg and Morrey functional rating score (0 to 100: best result) at 2 years.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Biodegradable pins versus standard metal screws, Outcome 2 Broberg and Morrey functional rating score ‐ excellent or good results.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Biodegradable pins versus standard metal screws, Outcome 3 Overall adverse events.
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Biodegradable pins versus standard metal screws, Outcome 4 Individual adverse events.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Chen 2011 {published data only}
    1. Chen X, Wang SC, Cao LH, Yang GQ, Li M, Su JC. Comparison between radial head replacement and open reduction and internal fixation in clinical treatment of unstable, multi‐fragmented radial head fractures. International Orthopaedics 2011;35(7):1071‐6. [EMBASE: 2011430181; MEDLINE: ] - PMC - PubMed
Helling 2006 {published data only}
    1. Helling HJ, Prokop A, Schmid HU, Nagel M, Lilienthal J, Rehm KE. Biodegradable implants versus standard metal fixation for displaced radial head fractures. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2006;15(4):479‐85. [PUBMED: 16831654] - PubMed
    1. Rehm KE, Helling HJ, Gatzka C. New developments in the application of resorbable implants [Neue Entwicklungen beim Einsatz resorbierbarer Implantate]. Orthopäde 1997;26(5):489‐97. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
    1. Rehm KE, Nagel M, Lilienthal J, Helling HJ. Multi‐centre study radius head, metal vs. polypin ‐ An interim report [Multicenterstudie radiuskopfchen, metall vs polypin ‐ Ein zwischenbericht]. Hefte zur der Unfallchirurg 1998;265:195‐202.
Ruan 2009 {published data only}
    1. Ruan HJ, Fan CY, Liu JJ, Zeng BF. A comparative study of internal fixation and prosthesis replacement for radial head fractures of Mason type III. International Orthopaedics 2009;33(1):249‐53. [PUBMED: 17938924] - PMC - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Erturer 2010 {published data only}
    1. Erturer E, Seckin F, Akman S, Toker S, Sari S, Ozturk I. The results of open reduction and screw or K‐wire fixation for isolated type II radial head fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 2010;44(1):20‐6. [PUBMED: 20513987] - PubMed
Frankle 1999 {published data only}
    1. Frankle MA, Koval KJ, Sanders RW, Zuckerman JD. Radial head fractures associated with elbow dislocations treated by immediate stabilization and early motion. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 1999;8(4):355‐60. [PUBMED: 10472010] - PubMed
Ikeda 2005 {published data only}
    1. Ikeda M, Sugiyama K, Kang C, Takagaki T, Oka Y. Comminuted fractures of the radial head. Comparison of resection and internal fixation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery ‐ American Volume 2005;87(1):76‐84. [PUBMED: 15634816] - PubMed
Liu 2010 {published data only}
    1. Liu B, Lin Z, Cao L, Kang Y. Effectiveness comparison between open reduction combined with internal fixation and artificial radial head replacement in treating Mason type‐III comminuted fractures of radial head. Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery 2010;24(8):900‐3. [EMBASE: 20839431; PUBMED: 20839431] - PubMed
Obert 2005 {published data only}
    1. Obert L, Lepage D, Huot D, Givry F, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, et al. Unreconstructible radial head fracture: resection, implant of Swanson or prosthesis? Retrospective comparative study [Fracture de tete radiale non synthesable: resection, implant de Swanson ou prothese? Etude retrospective comparative]. Chirurgie de la Main 2005;24(1):17‐23. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Dabby 2006 {published data only}
    1. Dabby D, Patisch H, Blumberg N, Cohen I, Jakim I. Radial head fractures ‐ ORIF vs head prosthesis. Prospective randomized trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery ‐ British Volume 2006;88‐B (Suppl 2):346.

References to ongoing studies

Ascension 2009 {published data only}
    1. Ascension Orthopedics Inc. Safety and effectiveness study of Ascension's PyroCarbon radial head compared to Ascension's metal radial head. Accessed at clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00825409?term=NCT00825409&rank=1.

Additional references

AAOS 2007
    1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Radial head fractures. http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=A00073 (accessed 03/11/10) 2007.
Bano 2006
    1. Bano KY, Kahlon RS. Radial head fractures ‐ advanced techniques in surgical management and rehabilitation. Journal of Hand Therapy 2006;19(2):114‐35. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Bostman 1990
    1. Böstman O, Hirvensalo E, Mäkinen J, Rokkanen P. Foreign‐body reactions to fracture fixation implants of biodegradable synthetic polymers. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery ‐ British Volume 1990;72(4):592‐6. [PUBMED: 2199452] - PubMed
Broberg 1987
    1. Broberg MA, Morrey BF. Results of treatment of fracture‐dislocations of the elbow. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1987;(216):109‐19. [EMBASE: 1987108216; PUBMED: 3102139] - PubMed
Duckworth 2013
    1. Duckworth AD, McQueen MM, Ring D. Fractures of the radial head. Bone and Joint Journal 2013;95‐B(2):151‐9. [PUBMED: 23365021] - PubMed
Egger 1997
    1. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629‐34. [MEDLINE: ] - PMC - PubMed
Grant 2008
    1. Grant S, Sharma H. Radial head fracture management: current concepts and controversies. Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2008;59(1):49‐60.
Harrison 2007
    1. Harrison JWK, Chitre A, Lammin K, Warner JG, Hodgson SP. Radial head fractures in adults. Current Orthopaedics 2007;21(1):59‐64. [EMBASE: 2007141745]
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557‐60. [MEDLINE: ] - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2004
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression. Statistics in Medicine 2004;23(11):1663‐82. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Higgins 2008
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Ignatius 1996
    1. Ignatius AA, Claes LE. In vitro biocompatibility of bioresorbable polymers: poly(L, DL‐lactide) and poly(L‐lactide‐co‐glycolide). Biomaterials 1996;17(8):831‐9. [PUBMED: 8730968] - PubMed
Jensen 2003
    1. Jensen SL, Deutch SR, Olsen BS, Sojbjerg JO, Sneppen O. Laxity of the elbow after experimental excision of the radial head and division of the medial collateral ligament: efficacy of ligament repair and radial head prosthetic replacement: a cadaver study. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery ‐ British Volume 2003;85(7):1006‐10. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Johnston 1962
    1. Johnston GW. A follow‐up of one hundred cases of fracture of the head of the radius with a review of the literature. Ulster Medical Journal 1962;1(31):51‐56. [PUBMED: 14452145] - PMC - PubMed
Lefebvre 2008
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrame Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Limb 2013
    1. Limb D. external referee feedback February 28 2013.
Mason 1954
    1. Mason ML. Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases. British Journal of Surgery 1954;42(172):123‐32. [PUBMED: 13209035] - PubMed
Prokop 2002
    1. Prokop A, Jubel A, Helling HJ, Udomkaewkanjana C, Brochhagen HG, Rehm KE. New biodegradable polylactide implants (Polypin‐C) in therapy for radial head fractures [Neue biodegradable Polylactid‐implantate (Polypin®‐C) zur Therapie von Radiuskopffrakturen]. Der Chirurg 2002;73(10):997‐1004. [PUBMED: 12395158] - PubMed
SIGN 2008
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Search filters. Randomised controlled trials. Embase (accessed 19 April 2010). http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html#random.
Struijs 2007
    1. Struijs PA, Smit G, Steller EP. Radial head fractures: effectiveness of conservative treatment versus surgical intervention. A systematic review. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2007;127(2):125‐30. [PUBMED: 17066285] - PubMed
Stuffmann 2009
    1. Stuffmann E, Gannon A, Clemente J, Baratz M. Radial head prosthesis update. Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery 2009;10(1):31‐8.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources