Craniofacial surgery for esthesioneuroblastoma: report of an international collaborative study
- PMID: 23730550
- PMCID: PMC3424016
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311754
Craniofacial surgery for esthesioneuroblastoma: report of an international collaborative study
Abstract
Introduction Impact of treatment and prognostic indicators of outcome are relatively ill-defined in esthesioneuroblastomas (ENB) because of the rarity of these tumors. This study was undertaken to assess the impact of craniofacial resection (CFR) on outcome of ENB. Patients and Methods Data on 151 patients who underwent CFR for ENB were collected from 17 institutions that participated in an international collaborative study. Patient, tumor, treatment, and outcome data were collected by questionnaires and variables were analyzed for prognostic impact on overall, disease-specific and recurrence-free survival. The majority of tumors were staged Kadish stage C (116 or 77%). Overall, 90 patients (60%) had received treatment before CFR, radiation therapy in 51 (34%), and chemotherapy in 23 (15%). The margins of surgical resection were reported positive in 23 (15%) patients. Adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy was used in 51 (34%) and chemotherapy in 9 (6%) patients. Results Treatment-related complications were reported in 49 (32%) patients. With a median follow-up of 56 months, the 5-year overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival rates were 78, 83, and 64%, respectively. Intracranial extension of the disease and positive surgical margins were independent predictors of worse overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival on multivariate analysis. Conclusion This collaborative study of patients treated at various institutions across the world demonstrates the efficacy of CFR for ENB. Intracranial extension of disease and complete surgical excision were independent prognostic predictors of outcome.
Keywords: adjuvant; combined modality therapy; esthesioneuroblastoma; nose neoplasms/mortality/pathology/surgery/*therapy; olfactory/*therapy; radiotherapy; survival analysis.
Figures
References
-
- Broich G, Pagliari A, Ottaviani F. Esthesioneuroblastoma: a general review of the cases published since the discovery of the tumour in 1924. Anticancer Res. 1997;17(4A):2683–2706. - PubMed
-
- Dulguerov P, Allal A S, Calcaterra T C. Esthesioneuroblastoma: a meta-analysis and review. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(11):683–690. - PubMed
-
- Ejaz A, Wenig B M. Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: clinical and pathologic features and a discussion on classification, cellular differentiation, and differential diagnosis. Adv Anat Pathol. 2005;12(3):134–143. - PubMed
-
- Rosenthal D I, Barker J L, El-Naggar A K. et al.Sinonasal malignancies with neuroendocrine differentiation: patterns of failure according to histologic phenotype. Cancer. 2004;101(11):2567–2573. - PubMed
-
- Cohen Z R, Marmor E, Fuller G N, DeMonte F. Misdiagnosis of olfactory neuroblastoma. Neurosurg Focus. 2002;12(5):e3. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
