Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Jul 10;31(20):2586-92.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.2408. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

Randomized phase II study of the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized phase II study of the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

José Baselga et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Erratum in

  • Errata.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;36(1):98. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.9976. J Clin Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29281804 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor is overexpressed in metastatic triple-negative breast cancers (mTNBCs), an aggressive subtype of breast cancer. Our randomized phase II study investigated cisplatin with or without cetuximab in this setting.

Patients and methods: Patients who had received no more than one previous chemotherapy regimen were randomly assigned on a 2:1 schedule to receive no more than six cycles of cisplatin plus cetuximab or cisplatin alone. Patients receiving cisplatin alone could switch to cisplatin plus cetuximab or cetuximab alone on disease progression. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points studied included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles. Analyses included a significance level of α = .10 with no adjustments for multiplicity.

Results: The full analysis set comprised 115 patients receiving cisplatin plus cetuximab and 58 receiving cisplatin alone; 31 patients whose disease progressed on cisplatin alone switched to cetuximab-containing therapy. The ORR was 20% (95% CI, 13 to 29) with cisplatin plus cetuximab and 10% (95% CI, 4 to 21) with cisplatin alone (odds ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.81 to 5.59; P = .11). Cisplatin plus cetuximab resulted in longer PFS compared with cisplatin alone (median, 3.7 v 1.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.97; P = .032). Corresponding median OS was 12.9 versus 9.4 months (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.20; P = .31). Common grade 3/4 adverse events included acne-like rash, neutropenia, and fatigue.

Conclusion: While the primary study end point was not met, adding cetuximab to cisplatin doubled the ORR and appeared to prolong PFS and OS, warranting further investigation in mTNBC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). (A) Median PFS was significantly longer in patients who received cisplatin plus cetuximab compared with patients who received cisplatin alone (3.7 months [mos] v 1.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.97; P = .032). (B) Median OS was 12.9 months in the cisplatin plus cetuximab group and 9.4 months in the cisplatin-alone group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.20; P = .31).
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Odds ratios for best overall response rate in subgroup analyses. ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

References

    1. Cheang MC Voduc D Bajdik C , etal: Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype Clin Cancer Res 14: 1368– 1376,2008. - PubMed
    1. Kwan ML Kushi LH Weltzien E , etal: Epidemiology of breast cancer subtypes in two prospective cohort studies of breast cancer survivors Breast Cancer Res 11: R31,2009. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dent R Trudeau M Pritchard KI , etal: Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence Clin Cancer Res 13: 4429– 4434,2007. - PubMed
    1. Isakoff SJ: Triple-negative breast cancer: Role of specific chemotherapy agents Cancer J 16: 53– 61,2010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kassam F Enright K Dent R , etal: Survival outcomes for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Implications for clinical practice and trial design Clin Breast Cancer 9: 29– 33,2009. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms