Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 29;8(5):e65084.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065084. Print 2013.

Species-specific traits plus stabilizing processes best explain coexistence in biodiverse fire-prone plant communities

Affiliations

Species-specific traits plus stabilizing processes best explain coexistence in biodiverse fire-prone plant communities

Jürgen Groeneveld et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Coexistence in fire-prone Mediterranean-type shrublands has been explored in the past using both neutral and niche-based models. However, distinct differences between plant functional types (PFTs), such as fire-killed vs resprouting responses to fire, and the relative similarity of species within a PFT, suggest that coexistence models might benefit from combining both neutral and niche-based (stabilizing) approaches. We developed a multispecies metacommunity model where species are grouped into two PFTs (fire-killed vs resprouting) to investigate the roles of neutral and stabilizing processes on species richness and rank-abundance distributions. Our results show that species richness can be maintained in two ways: i) strictly neutral species within each PFT, or ii) species within PFTs differing in key demographic properties, provided that additional stabilizing processes, such as negative density regulation, also operate. However, only simulations including stabilizing processes resulted in structurally realistic rank-abundance distributions over plausible time scales. This result underscores the importance of including both key species traits and stabilizing (niche) processes in explaining species coexistence and community structure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Basic model assumptions.
a) The model works at two spatial scales: fire spread is modelled at a 1-ha resolution, whereas neighbourhoods of four contiguous grid cells all containing suitable habitat comprise a patch containing one local community. b) Number of seedlings per adult bi, vary between mature resprouters (crosses) and non-sprouters (circles). We varied non-sprouter reproductive rates across a wide range of plausible values (shaded grey area in Fig. 1b). c) Fire survival probabilities for resprouters change with plant age; variation in the fire survival probabilities are indicated by the grey shaded area in Fig. 1c.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Species richness and RAD.
Impact of non-sprouter number of seedlings per adult (the number of non-sprouter seedlings at age 9 βi), and resprouter maximum fire survival probability psurv,max on final species richness (after 10 000 time steps a,d,g) and RAD after 10 000 (b,e,h) and 100 000 years (c,f,i, circles show relative abundance of non-sprouters and triangles relative abundance of resprouters) for three selected scenarios: a,b,c) all demographic parameters are identical for species within a PFT and there is no density regulation (neutral), d,e,f) demographic parameters vary between species within a PFT and there is no density regulation(species differ), and g,h,i) demographic parameters vary between species and density regulation is operating (niche).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Simulated rank-abundance curves.
Simulated rank-abundance curves for two scenarios: neutral scenario, and niche scenario after 10 000 time steps (a, b) and 100 000 time steps (c, d). Circles represent non-sprouting species and triangles resprouting species. The simulation started with 132 non-sprouting and 132 resprouting species.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Sensitivity analysis.
Partial dependence plots for the four most important predictor variables for: a) overall species richness S, b) non-sprouter species richness SNS, and c) resprouter species richness SRE based on a boosted regression tree analysis of 2 010 random parameter samples (see Table 1 for details). The fitted value on the y-axis shows the effect of a given variable on the response after accounting for the average effects of all other variables in the model. The relative influence (%) of each predictor variable on the response is given in brackets in the legend of the x-axis.

References

    1. Hubbell SP (2001) The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 375 p.
    1. Latimer AM, Silander JA, Cowling RM (2005) Neutral ecological theory reveals isolation and rapid speciation in a biodiversity hot spot. Science 10: 1722–1725. - PubMed
    1. Perry GLW, Enright NJ, Miller BP, Lamont BB, Etienne RS (2009) Dispersal, edaphic fidelity and speciation in species-rich Western Australian shrublands: evaluating a neutral model of biodiversity. Oikos 118: 1349–1362.
    1. Rosindell J, Hubbell SP, He F, Harmon LJ, Etienne RS (2012) The case for ecological neutral theory. Trends Ecol Evol 27: 203–208. - PubMed
    1. Bell DT (2001) Ecological response syndromes in the flora of southwestern Western Australia: fire resprouters versus reseeders. Bot Rev 67: 417–440.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources