Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Jul 15;178(2):309-18.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kws465. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

Using a bayesian latent class model to evaluate the utility of investigating persons with negative polymerase chain reaction results for pertussis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Using a bayesian latent class model to evaluate the utility of investigating persons with negative polymerase chain reaction results for pertussis

Gillian A M Tarr et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Pertussis remains difficult to control. Imperfect sensitivity of diagnostic tests and lack of specific guidance regarding interpretation of negative test results among patients with compatible symptoms may contribute to its spread. In this study, we examined whether additional pertussis cases could be identified if persons with negative pertussis test results were routinely investigated. We conducted interviews among 250 subjects aged ≤18 years with pertussis polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results reported from 2 reference laboratories in Wisconsin during July-September 2010 to determine whether their illnesses met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's clinical case definition (CCD) for pertussis. PCR validity measures were calculated using the CCD as the standard for pertussis disease. Two Bayesian latent class models were used to adjust the validity measures for pertussis detectable by 1) culture alone and 2) culture and/or more sensitive measures such as serology. Among 190 PCR-negative subjects, 54 (28%) had illnesses meeting the CCD. In adjusted analyses, PCR sensitivity and the negative predictive value were 1) 94% and 99% and 2) 43% and 87% in the 2 types of models, respectively. The models suggested that public health follow-up of reported pertussis patients with PCR-negative results leads to the detection of more true pertussis cases than follow-up of PCR-positive persons alone. The results also suggest a need for a more specific pertussis CCD.

Keywords: Bayesian analysis; Bordetella pertussis; pertussis; polymerase chain reaction; predictive value of tests; public health surveillance; sensitivity; whooping cough.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Selection of the study sample for an evaluation of the utility of investigating suspected pertussis cases reported to the Wisconsin Immunization Program (WIP) and testing negative for Bordetella pertussis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed at 2 laboratories in Wisconsin, July 1, 2010–September 30, 2010. Subjects included in the analysis are indicated by boxes with a thick outline. Subjects excluded from the analysis are indicated by boxes with a dashed outline.

References

    1. Mattoo S, Cherry JD. Molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of respiratory infections due to Bordetella pertussis and other Bordetella subspecies. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(2):326–382. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heininger U. Update on pertussis in children. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8(2):163–173. - PubMed
    1. Cherry JD, Grimprel E, Guiso N, et al. Defining pertussis epidemiology: clinical, microbiologic and serologic perspectives. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(5 suppl):S25–S34. - PubMed
    1. Loeffelholz MJ, Thompson CJ, Long KS, et al. Comparison of PCR, culture, and direct fluorescent-antibody testing for detection of Bordetella pertussis. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(9):2872–2876. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chapter 10: pertussis. In: Manual for the Surveillance of Vaccine-preventable Diseases. 5th ed. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011. pp. 10-1–10-11.

Publication types

MeSH terms