Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;5(6):1233-45.
doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt090.

Genome-wide characterization of adaptation and speciation in tiger swallowtail butterflies using de novo transcriptome assemblies

Affiliations

Genome-wide characterization of adaptation and speciation in tiger swallowtail butterflies using de novo transcriptome assemblies

Wei Zhang et al. Genome Biol Evol. 2013.

Abstract

Hybrid speciation appears to be rare in animals, yet characterization of possible examples offers to shed light on the genomic consequences of this unique phenomenon, as well as more general processes such as the role of adaptation in speciation. Here, we first generate transcriptome assemblies for a putative hybrid butterfly species, Papilio appalachiensis, its parental species, P. glaucus and P. canadensis, and an outgroup, P. polytes. Then, we use these data to infer genome-wide patterns of introgression and genomic mosaicism using both phylogenetic and population genetic approaches. Our results reveal that there is little genetic divergence among all three of the focal species, but the subset of gene trees that strongly support a specific tree topology suggest widespread sharing of genetic variation between P. appalachiensis and both parental species, likely as a result of hybrid speciation. We also find evidence for substantial shared genetic variation between P. glaucus and P. canadensis, which may be due to gene flow or ancestral variation. Consistent with previous work, we show that P. applachiensis is more similar to P. canadensis at Z-linked genes and more similar to P. glaucus at mitochondrial genes. We also identify a variety of targets of adaptive evolution, which appear to be enriched for traits that are likely to be important in the evolution of this butterfly system, such as pigmentation, hormone sensitivity, developmental processes, and cuticle formation. Overall, our results provide a genome-wide portrait of divergence and introgression associated with adaptation and speciation in an iconic butterfly radiation.

Keywords: Papilio; adaptation; hybrid speciation; introgression; transcriptome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>ig</sc>. 1.—
Fig. 1.—
Distribution of conserved clusters among the four butterfly species. Conserved clusters were retrieved from predicted CDS data sets using Blat. A total of 3,961 clusters yielded a single sequence for each species and this set of conserved clusters was the core data set for subsequent analyses. Each species is depicted with images of female wing pattern phenotypes.
F<sc>ig</sc>. 2.—
Fig. 2.—
Patterson’s D-statistic suggests widespread introgression between Papilio appalachiensis and the putative parental species. We calculated a transcriptome-wide D-statistic value for each of three tree topologies (A–C) and found evidence for significant introgression in comparisons with P. appalachiensis (D). Results suggest roughly equal introgression between appalachiensis/canadensis, compared with appalachiensis/glaucus (D1, P = 0.715), but much more introgression between appalachiensis/canadensis and appalachiensis/glaucus, compared with glaucus/canadensis (D2 and D3, P < 0.01 for both).
F<sc>ig</sc>. 3.—
Fig. 3.—
Genome-wide distribution and clustering of genes by tree topology. We mapped conserved clusters back to the genome of Heliconius melpomene (A and C) and Bombyx mori (B and D) and compared the chromosome-level distribution of clusters with a given tree topology with the null distribution given by all mapped clusters. The results of these tests are in table 6. (A, B) Tree topologies based on nucleotide alignments whereas (C) and (D) are based on peptide alignments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott RJ, Rieseberg LH. Hybrid speciation. Encyclopaedia of Life Sciences (eLS) Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
    1. Andolfatto P. Controlling type-I error of the McDonald-Kreitman test in genomewide scans for selection on noncoding DNA. Genetics. 2008;180:1767–1771. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anisimova M, Bielawski JP, Yang Z. Accuracy and power of the likelihood ratio test in detecting adaptive molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18:1585–1592. - PubMed
    1. Brower JVZ. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies: Part II. Battus philenor and Papilio troilus, P. polyxenes and P. glaucus. Evolution. 1958;12:123–136.
    1. Buerkle CA, Rieseberg LH. The rate of genome stabilization in homoploid hybrid species. Evolution. 2007;62:266–275. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources