Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:970703.
doi: 10.1155/2013/970703. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty

Affiliations

A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty

Nathan A Netravali et al. Adv Orthop. 2013.

Abstract

Knee arthroplasty is used to treat patients with degenerative joint disease of the knee to reduce pain and restore the function of the joint. Although patient outcomes are generally quite good, there are still a number of patients that are dissatisfied with their procedures. Aside from implant design which has largely become standard, surgical technique is one of the main factors that determine clinical results. Therefore, a lot of effort has gone into improving surgical technique including the use of computer-aided surgery. The latest generation of orthopedic surgical tools involves the use of robotics to enhance the surgeons' abilities to install implants more precisely and consistently. This review presents an evolution of robot-assisted surgical systems for knee replacement with an emphasis on the clinical results available in the literature. Ever since various robotic-assistance systems were developed and used clinically worldwide, studies have demonstrated that these systems are as safe as and more accurate than conventional methods of manual implantation. Robotic surgical assistance will likely result in improved surgical technique and improved clinical results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Swank ML, Alkire M, Conditt M, Lonner JH. Technology and cost-effectiveness in knee arthroplasty: computer navigation and robotics. The American Journal of Orthopedics. 2009;38(2, supplement):32–36. - PubMed
    1. Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, McGlynn FJ. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2008;23(3):408–412. - PubMed
    1. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002;(404):7–13. - PubMed
    1. Emmerson KP, Moran CG, Pinder IM. Survivorship analysis of the kinematic stabilizer total knee replacement: A 10–14 year follow-up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B. 1996;78:441–445. - PubMed
    1. Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. The posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis: Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year minimum follow-up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A. 1995;77:1713–1720. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources