Biomechanics and load resistance of short dental implants: a review of the literature
- PMID: 23738085
- PMCID: PMC3664491
- DOI: 10.1155/2013/424592
Biomechanics and load resistance of short dental implants: a review of the literature
Abstract
This paper was aimed to review the studies published about short dental implants. In the focus were the works that investigated the effect of biting forces of the rate of marginal bone resorption around short implants and their survival rates. Bone deformation defined by strain was obviously higher around short implants than the conventional ones. The clinical outcomes of 6 mm short implants after 2 years showed a survival rate of 94% to 95% and lower survival rate (<80%) for 7 mm short implants after 3 to 6 years for single crown restorations. The short implants used for supporting fixed partial prostheses had a survival rate of 98.9%. Short implants can be considered as a good alternative implant therapy to support single crown or partial fixed restorations.
References
-
- Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. Journal of Periodontology. 1991;62(1):2–4. - PubMed
-
- Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up report. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1993;8(6):635–640. - PubMed
-
- Wyatt CCL, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1998;13(2):204–211. - PubMed
-
- Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, Van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism—part 1: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2002;13(4):381–389. - PubMed
-
- Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Quirynen M, Duyck J, Van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism—part 2: a longitudinal radiographic evaluation. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2002;13(4):390–395. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
