Clocks for the city: circadian differences between forest and city songbirds
- PMID: 23740778
- PMCID: PMC3774226
- DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0593
Clocks for the city: circadian differences between forest and city songbirds
Abstract
To keep pace with progressing urbanization organisms must cope with extensive habitat change. Anthropogenic light and noise have modified differences between day and night, and may thereby interfere with circadian clocks. Urbanized species, such as birds, are known to advance their activity to early morning and night hours. We hypothesized that such modified activity patterns are reflected by properties of the endogenous circadian clock. Using automatic radio-telemetry, we tested this idea by comparing activity patterns of free-living forest and city European blackbirds (Turdus merula). We then recaptured the same individuals and recorded their activity under constant conditions. City birds started their activity earlier and had faster but less robust circadian oscillation of locomotor activity than forest conspecifics. Circadian period length predicted start of activity in the field, and this relationship was mainly explained by fast-paced and early-rising city birds. Although based on only two populations, our findings point to links between city life, chronotype and circadian phenotype in songbirds, and potentially in other organisms that colonize urban habitats, and highlight that urban environments can significantly modify biologically important rhythms in wild organisms.
Keywords: birds; chronotype; circadian rhythms; light at night; radio-telemetry; urbanization.
Figures
References
-
- Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319, 756–760.10.1126/science.1150195 (doi:10.1126/science.1150195) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D. 2006. From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 186–191.10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.019 (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.019) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Longcore T, Rich C. 2006. Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Washington, DC: Island Press.
-
- Kempenaers B, Borgström P, Loës P, Schlicht E, Valcu M. 2010. Artificial night lighting affects dawn song, extra-pair siring success, and lay date in songbirds. Curr. Biol. 20, 1735–1739.10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.028 (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.028) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rotics S, Dayan T, Kronfeld-Schor N. 2011. Effect of artificial night lighting on temporally partitioned spiny mice. J. Mammol. 92, 159–168.10.1644/10-MAMM-A-112.1 (doi:10.1644/10-MAMM-A-112.1) - DOI - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources