Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Apr-Jun;20(2):150-7.
doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.110604.

The Muranga Teleophthalmology Study: Comparison of Virtual (Teleglaucoma) with in-Person Clinical Assessment to Diagnose Glaucoma

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The Muranga Teleophthalmology Study: Comparison of Virtual (Teleglaucoma) with in-Person Clinical Assessment to Diagnose Glaucoma

Dan Kiage et al. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: While the effectiveness of teleophthalmology is generally accepted, its ability to diagnose glaucomatous eye disease remains relatively unknown. This study aimed to compare a web-based teleophthalmology assessment with clinical slit lamp examination to screen for glaucoma among diabetics in a rural African district.

Materials and methods: Three hundred and nine diabetic patients underwent both the clinical slit lamp examination by a comprehensive ophthalmologist and teleglaucoma (TG) assessment by a glaucoma subspecialist. Both assessments were compared for any focal glaucoma damage; for TG, the quality of photographs was assessed, and vertical cup-to-disk ratio (VCDR) was calculated in a semi-automated manner. In patients with VCDR > 0.7, the diagnostic precision of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) C-20 screening program was assessed.

Results: Of 309 TG assessment photos, 74 (24%) were deemed unreadable due to media opacities, patient cooperation, and unsatisfactory photographic technique. While the identification of individual optic nerve factors showed either fair or moderate agreement, the ability to diagnose glaucoma based on the overall assessment showed moderate agreement (Kappa [κ] statistic 0.55% and 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.62). The use of FDT to detect glaucoma in the presence of disc damage (VCDR > 0.7) showed substantial agreement (κ statistic of 0.84 and 95% CI 0.79-0.90). A positive TG diagnosis of glaucoma carried a 77.5% positive predictive value, and a negative TG diagnosis carried an 82.2% negative predicative value relative to the clinical slit lamp examination.

Conclusion: There was moderate agreement between the ability to diagnose glaucoma using TG relative to clinical slit lamp examination. Poor quality photographs can severely limit the ability of TG assessment to diagnose optic nerve damage and glaucoma. Although further work and validation is needed, the TG approach provides a novel, and promising method to diagnose glaucoma, a major cause of ocular morbidity throughout the world.

Keywords: Glaucoma; Optic Neuropathy; Slit Lamp Examination; Teleglaucoma; Teleophthalmology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Age distribution of study population
Figure 2
Figure 2
Merged data set compilation

References

    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. [Accessed 2012 Nov 27];Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 90:262–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook C, Foster P. Epidemiology of glaucoma: What's new. [Accessed 2012 Nov 27];Can J Ophthalmol. 2012 47:223–6. - PubMed
    1. Cook C, Cockburn N, van der Merwe J, Ehrlich R. Cataract and glaucoma case detection for Vision 2020 programs in Africa: An evaluation of 6 possible screening tests. [Accessed 2012 Nov 27];J Glaucoma. 2009 18:557–62. - PubMed
    1. Cedrone C, Mancino R, Cerulli A, Cesareo M, Nucci C. Epidemiology of Primary Glaucoma: Prevalence, Incidence, and Blinding Effects. Progress in Brain Research. 2008;173:3014. - PubMed
    1. Rotchford AP, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in Zulus: A population-based cross-sectional survey in a rural district in South Africa. [Accessed 2012 Nov 27];Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 120:471–8. - PubMed

Publication types